MedTrace Logo

Efficacy of Patient Controlled Epidural Anesthesia Versus Continuous Epidural Analgesia for Post-thoracotomy Pain

NCT01560429 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 52

Last updated 2016-07-21

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

Postoperative thoracotomy pain is normally managed with an epidural catheter and continuous epidural analgesia (CEA). However, for some surgical procedures, patient controlled epidural anesthesia (PCEA) is more effective but little research has compared the two methods following thoracotomy. The current randomized, prospective clinical investigation did just this. Following institutional ethics approval 52 patients scheduled for thoracotomy were recruited for this prospective, randomized, unblinded study. A thoracic epidural catheter was sited preoperatively. Postoperatively all patients were titrated on continuous epidural infusions (hydromorphone 10 mcg/mL + bupivacaine 1 mg/mL) until pain scores were stable at ≤3 on a numeric rating scale (NRS). Then they were allocated to their preoperatively determined randomization (either remained on continuous epidural infusion or they were switched to receive 2/3 of the stabilized background dose via continuous epidural infusion with the option to self-administer the remaining 1/3rd of the dose via PCEA. Participants remained on their allocated analgesic regimens for 48 hours postoperatively. The primary outcome was consumption of local anaesthetics/opioids. The secondary outcomes were worst pain and pain while coughing (0-10 NRS).

Conditions

  • Acute Post-thoracotomy Pain

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Patient controlled epidural analgesia

Continuous epidural infusion rates were set to maintain pain scores of ≤ 3 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 while in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) following thoracotomy. Once stabilized patients were switched to Patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) which meant they continued to receive 2/3rds of the dose as continuous background epidural infusions but they had the option to receive the remaining 1/3rd dosage via PCEA.

PROCEDURE

Continuous epidural analgesia

The continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) infusion rates were titrated to achieve pain scores of ≤ 3 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 while in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (as described for the PCEA group above). Those allocated to the CEA group remained on the same continuous epidural analgesia infusion which maintained the pain scores at ≤ 3.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Queen's University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Vidur Shyam, MBBS, FRCPC · Queen's University & Kingston General Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-06-30
Primary Completion
2010-07-31
Completion
2010-07-31

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01560429 on ClinicalTrials.gov