Retention of Three Different Types of Telescopic Attachments

NCT06632548 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2024-10-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study was conducted on thirty patients. These patients were divided into three groups in a random manner to compare the retention forces between three different types of secondary crowns used to stabilize two implant mandibular overdentures. in all groups the primary coping was fabricated from milled titanium while the secondary coping was milled titanium in first group ,3D printed cobalt chromium in the second group and milled poly ether ketone ketone in the third group the retention forces was measured using forcemeter immediately after insertion and after 3,6, months

Conditions

  • Edentulism
  • Denture Retention

Interventions

DEVICE

telescopic overdenture

two implant retained mandibular overdenture with telescopic attachment

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Moatz Aly Ahmed Hussien

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
55 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-08-30
Primary Completion
2024-01-30
Completion
2024-03-30

Countries

  • Egypt

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06632548 on ClinicalTrials.gov