Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness of Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (FELD) and Microdiscectomy (MD) in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT06615518 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 220
Last updated 2025-11-20
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the clinical effectiveness of Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (FELD) and Microdiscectomy (MD) in patients aged 18-85 with single-level lumbar disc herniation who have not undergone prior lumbar surgery. This study also aims to perform a radiological analysis of MRI scans before and after treatment to optimize patient selection and surgical strategies. The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does FELD provide superior early postoperative pain relief (measured by VAS) compared to MD?
* Does FELD offer better functional recovery (measured by COMI and ODI scores) postoperatively compared to MD?
* Can radiological analysis of pre- and post-operative MRI images help optimize patient qualification and guide surgical strategies?
Researchers will compare patients undergoing FELD to those undergoing MD to see if endoscopic techniques result in faster recovery and lower early postoperative pain while maintaining similar long-term outcomes. The study will also analyze how MRI findings correlate with clinical outcomes to refine operative decision-making.
Participants will:
* Undergo either FELD or MD surgery
* Complete VAS, COMI, and ODI questionnaires at pre-specified follow-up intervals (1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery)
* Have MRI scans 24 hours before surgery, 24 hours after surgery, and at each follow-up to assess disc recurrence, residual pathology, and to optimize surgical strategies.
Conditions
- Lumbar Degenerative Disease
- Lumbar Radiculopathy
- Sciatic Leg Pain
- Sciatic Nerve Compression
- Discopathy
- Disc Herniation
- Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy
FELD is a minimally invasive spine surgery technique performed through small incisions using an endoscope. The procedure involves accessing the herniated disc through either the transforaminal (TELD) or interlaminar (IELD) approach, depending on the location of the disc herniation. The endoscopic approach allows for direct visualization of the affected area using a camera, and specialized instruments are used to remove the herniated portion of the disc. What distinguishes this intervention: * Small incisions (typically \<1 cm) result in less soft tissue damage compared to traditional open surgery. * Real-time endoscopic visualization allows for precise disc removal and reduced trauma to surrounding structures such as muscles and ligaments. * Minimized postoperative pain and faster recovery times due to the less invasive nature of the procedure. * Outpatient or short hospital stay is often possible, contributing to faster patient discharge.
- PROCEDURE
-
Interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy
FELD is a minimally invasive spine surgery technique performed through small incisions using an endoscope. The procedure involves accessing the herniated disc through either the transforaminal (TELD) or interlaminar (IELD) approach, depending on the location of the disc herniation. The endoscopic approach allows for direct visualization of the affected area using a camera, and specialized instruments are used to remove the herniated portion of the disc. What distinguishes this intervention: * Small incisions (typically \<1 cm) result in less soft tissue damage compared to traditional open surgery. * Real-time endoscopic visualization allows for precise disc removal and reduced trauma to surrounding structures such as muscles and ligaments. * Minimized postoperative pain and faster recovery times due to the less invasive nature of the procedure. * Outpatient or short hospital stay is often possible, contributing to faster patient discharge.
- PROCEDURE
-
Microdiscectomy
Microdiscectomy is a conventional surgical technique for treating lumbar disc herniation, involving a small open incision. In this procedure, the surgeon makes an incision typically between 2-3 cm in length, then uses an operating microscope to gain magnified visualization of the herniated disc. The surgeon removes part of the lamina (laminotomy) to access the disc and nerves. Special instruments are used to remove the herniated portion of the disc that is compressing the spinal nerves, relieving symptoms such as pain, numbness, and weakness. What distinguishes this intervention: * Larger incision (2-3 cm) compared to FELD, but still smaller than traditional open discectomy, allowing better visualization. * Microscopic magnification allows precise removal of disc material while minimizing trauma to surrounding neural structures. * Direct access to the affected area via the removal of part of the lamina (laminotomy), offering a well-established and highly effective approach to reli
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Opole
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Kajetan Latka, PhD · University of Opole
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 85 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-03-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-01-12
- Completion
- 2025-12-01
Countries
- Poland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Flexion-Distraction Technique
NCT06886334 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Radiofrequency Nucleoplasty vs Percutaneous Nucleotomy vs Decompression Catheter in Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT00300898 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Conventional vs. Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
NCT03137485 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3rd-year Post-surgical Evaluation of Adjacent Segment Disc Degeneration Onset in Lumbar Spine (Spinal Fusion vs. Lumbar Arthroplasty With Disc Replacement)
NCT05561322 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Add by Annuloplasty and Nucleoplasty
NCT05584774 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Trial of Annular Repair With Discectomy Versus Discectomy Alone for Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT07250581 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Predictors of Axial Pain Improvement After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
NCT06601634 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Open Discectomy Versus Microscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT04112485 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Complications Rate and Treatment Costs of Mini-TLIF and MIDLIF in the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT07127380 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Position-Induced Opening of the Intervertebral Foramen is Efficient to Treat an Acute Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Caused by Disc Herniation
NCT04276519 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The NORDSTEN Studies/ The Spinal Stenosis Study
NCT02007083 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Non-pharmacological Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation : A Pilot Study
NCT04833270 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Microdiscectomy: RCT, Non-inferiority Trial
NCT03924700 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Treatment Comparison for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT00444405 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Paraspinal Muscle Remodeling
NCT03753711 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of PLDD Versus ESI in the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain
NCT05601791 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Study Comparing Peloid Therapy and Hot Pack Treatment in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain Caused by Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT07087548 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study to Assess the Performance of MagnEtOs Flex Matrix Compared to Cellular Allograft
NCT06415123 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Microendoscopic Discectomy Vs Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Vs Open Discectomy
NCT02358291 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Learning Curve, Outcome Parameters, and MRI Assessment of Disc Evacuation After Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
NCT05521750 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
MIS-D Versus MIS-TLIF for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT04318795 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trial to Show Non-inferiority / Superiority of an Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy to Standard Microdiscectomy
NCT01622413 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Non-pharmacological Treatment and Pharmacological Treatment for Non-acute Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT05003726 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Lumbar Discectomy Control Study, Risk Factors for Reherniation
NCT02477176 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
A Randomized Trial Comparing SpineJet® Hydrodiscectomy to Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Treatment of Lumbar Radiculopathy Due to Disc Herniation
NCT00384007 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA