Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the SpheriKA® (MEDACTA) and Origin® (SYMBIOS) Prostheses During Total Knee Replacement Using the Kinematic Alignment Technique
NCT06603103 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120
Last updated 2026-04-01
Summary
The traditional technique for implanting a total knee prosthesis, known as mechanical alignment, does not aim to preserve the original anatomy and laxity of the knee. Instead, the implants are "systematically" aligned to create a non-naturally straight lower limb. Respectively 20% and 50% of patients with a mechanically aligned total knee prosthesis are dissatisfied with the result, and complain of residual symptoms. A newer, more physiological technique for implanting a total knee prosthesis, known as kinematic alignment, aims to recreate the unique native anatomy and laxity of each patient\'s knee. The kinematic alignment technique has been shown to reduce the risk of residual symptoms and thus improve the patient\'s experience of his or her prosthetic knee. As a result of the emergence of the kinematic alignment technique, two manufacturers have developed total knee prosthesis implants specifically for this new insertion technique. A "made-to-measure" total knee prosthesis (ORIGIN® - Symbios, Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland) was developed with the aim of reproducing the unique contour of each implanted knee. Another manufacturer opted to develop a generic total knee prosthesis implant (SPHERIKA® - Medacta, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland), but with a design optimized for the kinematic alignment technique. These two models of total knee prosthesis each offer advantages and limitations that need to be assessed. The main aim of this study is therefore to compare the joint perception of these 2 prostheses. It will also look at the clinical and imaging results, the biomechanics of the prosthetic knee during gait, and the muscular strength of knee extension, obtained for these 2 total knee prostheses.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
SPHERIKA prosthesis
total knee arthroplasty with kinematic alignement with SPHERIKA prosthesis
- PROCEDURE
-
ORIGIN prosthesis
total knee arthroplasty with kinematic alignement with ORIGIN prosthesis
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Clinique du Sport, Bordeaux Mérignac
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-10-03
- Primary Completion
- 2028-03-31
- Completion
- 2028-04-30
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Medacta GMK Sphere® vs. Medacta GMK PS Post-Market Outcomes Study
NCT03391323 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Unicompartment Arthroplasty Retrospective and Clinical Outcome Study
NCT02583113 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Physica System Total Knee Replacement Registry Study
NCT03048201 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of A Mobile-Bearing Total Knee System With A Fixed-Bearing Total Knee System In Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT00589108 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Two Surgical Strategies for Robotic Implantation of Total Knee Prostheses (Stryker), Cemented Versus Uncemented
NCT04692714 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Multi-Center Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of the LEGION Medial Stabilized (MS) Insert in Patients Undergoing a Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
NCT07199738 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Total Knee Arthroplasty and Augmented Reality-based Navigation System
NCT05233930 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Cemented Versus Cementless Tibial Prosthesis Study
NCT01041937 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Total Knee Replacement in Improving Rehabilitation and Function
NCT00710840 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study Comparing Three Tibial Component Designs in Total Knee Arthoplasty
NCT00589147 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Physica System KR Vs Physica System CR (K-20)
NCT04594447 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial of Mechanical Axis With Soft Tissue Release Balancing vs Functional Alignment With Bony Release Balancing in Total Knee Replacement Using Stryker's Mako Robot
NCT04600583 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of a Knee Brace When Combined With Viscosupplementation in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT01478386 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment Randomized Trial
NCT06787417 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Comparison of Total Knee Replacement Patients Using the Zimmer-Biomet Persona Total Knee System With Different Inserts
NCT04643119 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Medacta GMK Sphere® Multicenter Post-Market Outcomes Study
NCT02501733 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Use of Spinal Epimorph in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT01667445 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Native Alignment in the Setting of an Arthritic Knee in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06617338 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Knee Replacement Outcomes (MIKRO) Study
NCT00633113 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study Evaluating the Outcomes of a New Knee System with a Physiological Rollback Mechanism
NCT02118272 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Physica TT Tibial Plate Prospective Study
NCT06830603 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Using ROSA for Challenging The TKA Standard of Care
NCT06267482 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Rate of Return to Sport After Total Knee Prosthesis: Comparison of Three Types of Prostheses
NCT05928403 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Functional Outcome After Knee Replacement
NCT02494544 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Physica CR and Physica PS Clinical Trial
NCT02766231 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING