MedTrace Logo

Fluid Responsiveness in Posterior Fossa Tumor Resection: PPV and CVP Guidance

NCT06595667 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2024-09-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To answer the question: What are the differences in intraoperative fluid administration volumes between PPV and CVP-guided strategies during posterior fossa tumor resection in the park bench position?

Conditions

  • Posterior Fossa Tumor
  • Brain Tumor Adult

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Pulse pressure variation

Fluid administration during posterior fossa surgery in the parkbench position is guided by the PPV value.

PROCEDURE

Central venous pressure

Fluid administration during posterior fossa surgery in the parkbench position is guided by the CVP value.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Chiang Mai University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Pathomporn P Pin on, Associate Professor · Chiang Mai University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-09-02
Primary Completion
2025-09-20
Completion
2025-10-31

Countries

  • Thailand

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06595667 on ClinicalTrials.gov