MedTrace Logo

Percutaneous vs Conventional Radiofrequency Applications for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritic Pain

NCT06520371 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2025-01-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aims to compare percutaneous and conventional radiofrequency applications for the treatment of knee osteoarthritic pain.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Percutaneous radiofrequency

For the percutaneous radiofrequency treatment, a medium electrode size will be placed on either side of the knee: one skin electrode on the inside and one on the outside of the knee for 15 minutes.

DEVICE

Conventional radiofrequency

For the conventional radiofrequency treatment, a 50 Hz sensory stimulation will be performed with a 10 cm, 22 gauge, 10 mm active tip radiofrequency cannula. After receiving the appropriate sensory and motor stimuli, a radiofrequency of 90°C will be applied for 90 s.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Tanta University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-07-25
Primary Completion
2024-12-31
Completion
2024-12-31

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06520371 on ClinicalTrials.gov