MedTrace Logo

Efficacy and Safety of Different Hyaluronic Acid Tear Substitutes Formulations in Evaporative Dry Eye

NCT06517667 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2024-07-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of different hyaluronic acid tear substitutes formulations in patients with evaporative dry eye. For this purpose, a randomized, single-blind clinical trial has been designed.

Conditions

  • Dry Eye

Interventions

DRUG

Icross tear substitute

Patients were instructed to instill 1 drop of 0.20% Cross-linked hyaluronic acid substitute into each eye 3 times per day for 3 months.

DRUG

Hyabak tear substitute

Patients were instructed to instill 1 drop of 0.15% hyaluronic acid substitute into each eye 3 times per day for 3 months.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Seville

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • José-María Sánchez-González · University of Seville

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-11-01
Primary Completion
2024-02-01
Completion
2024-06-01

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06517667 on ClinicalTrials.gov