Radiofrequency and Myofascial Pain Syndrome in Postpartum Pelvic Pain
NCT06469632 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 74
Last updated 2024-06-21
Summary
About 30% of women experience pain in the perineum and pelvic region one year after the vaginal labor, rising up to 50% when it is triggered during vaginal penetration, called this pain as dyspareunia. An early physiotherapy treatment could be the solution to the pain relief of these women. Thus, the objectives of the present randomised clinical trail are (i) to determine the effectiveness of a physiotherapy treatment based on education therapeutic, the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) of the pelvic floor muscles (PFM), and PFM specific training with or without radiofrequency in reducing pain and improving sexual function; and, (ii) to know the facilitating factors and barriers in adherence and perceived self-efficacy towards physiotherapy treatment of women with pelviperineal pain in the postpartum.
Methodology: randomized clinical trial with examinator blinding and two parallel groups, followed by a qualitative study. Thirty eight women per group will be needed with postpartum pelviperineal pain between 8 weeks after labour, with intensity ≥ 4 cm on the visual analogue scale. The assignment will be random to an Experimental 1 group based on therapeutic education, plus conservative and invasive treatment of MPS and specific PFM exercise versus an Experimental 2 group consisted in the same treatment plus non-ablative radiofrequency treatment. In both cases, 12 individual supervised sessions will be held by a physiotherapist specialized in women's health, with evaluations pre- and post-intervention, at 3 and 6 months. The outcome variables will be the intensity of the pain, the presence of MPS at PFM, the PFM contraction quality, sexual function and specific quality of life. The qualitative study will be carried out in the assessment 6 months post-intervention, through interviews semi-structured and focus groups. The interviews will be guided with previous questions established, recorded, transcribed and thematically analyzed by a panel of experts.
Conditions
- To be Approved by the Ethics Committee
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Active Comparator: Experimental Group 1
Multimodal physiotherapy treatment composed of: Therapeutic education about anatomy, physiology and pathophysiology of the abdomino-pelvic cavity, pelvic floor dysfunctions and risk factors, the concept of pain and its associated factors, as well as individual strategies to manage pain. Specific PFM exercises performing different types of contractions aimed at improving proprioception, strength, resistance and relaxation capacity. Conservative and invasive treatment of MPS active myofascial trigger points (MTP) will be treated by dry needling and Swiss technique. Latent MTP will be treated using the Swiss technique.
- OTHER
-
Experimental: Experimental Group 2
Multimodal physiotherapy treatment composed of: Therapeutic education about anatomy, physiology and pathophysiology of the abdomino-pelvic cavity, pelvic floor dysfunctions and risk factors, the concept of pain and its associated factors, as well as individual strategies to manage pain. Specific PFM exercises performing different types of contractions aimed at improving proprioception, strength, resistance and relaxation capacity. Conservative and invasive treatment of MPS active myofascial trigger points (MTP) will be treated by dry needling and Swiss technique. Latent MTP will be treated using the Swiss technique. Non-ablative radiofrequency: using capacitive superficial electrodes and resistive superficial and intravaginal electrodes.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Alcala
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Beatriz Navarro-Brazález, PhD · Physiotherapy in Women's Health (FPSM) Research Group. Physiotherapy Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28805 Madrid, Spain.
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-06-27
- Primary Completion
- 2024-10-31
- Completion
- 2025-11-30
Countries
- Spain
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Efficacy of Therapy Using Monopolar Dielectric Radiofrequency Signals on the Symptoms of Myofascial Trigger Points in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain.
NCT05471258 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Myofascial Release and Electrical Stimulation in Chronic Pelvic Pain
NCT05851742 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Radiofrequency Intervention in Post-COVID-19 Patients With Musculoskeletal Sequelae
NCT07074184 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial of Vaginal Cryotherapy for Pelvic Floor Myofascial Pain
NCT03885791 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Standard Care With LLLT & Myofascial Release Versus Standard Care Alone in Pregnant Women With Temporomandibular Disorder
NCT05138354 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pulsed Radiofrequency of Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve
NCT06187883 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Trial of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Medial Branch Nerves for theTreatment of Lumbar Facet Syndrome
NCT02478437 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Extracorporeal Shockwave and Myofascial Release Therapy in Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome
NCT05659199 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Lumbar Spine Manipulation Versus Pharmacological Therapy in Young Women With Primary Dysmenorrhea
NCT04866355 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Combined Treatment of Manual Therapy and Nervous Vagus Stimulation in Patients With Myogenic Temporomandibular Disorders
NCT05272488 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Structured Myofascial Release
NCT06744608 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pulsed Radiofrequency vs Dry Needling in Myofascial Pain
NCT05637047 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Dry Needling and Dry Cupping in Positional Fault of Pelvis
NCT04719689 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Ultrasound-guided PRF Versus DN in Myofascial Pain Patients
NCT06851000 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes After Dry Needling on Cervical Muscles, and Quality of Life, in Patients With Fibromyalgia Syndrome.
NCT03015662 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dry Needling Versus Conservative Treatment in the Rectus Femoris Muscle Approach.
NCT04968236 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Manual Therapy in Dysmenorrhea
NCT03593057 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
High-Intensity Focused Electromagnetic (HIFEM) Field Device in Women After Childbirth
NCT03758690 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
OMTrigger Inject- Treating Trigger Points: Comparing Muscle Energy Technique vs. Lidocaine Needling Technique
NCT05009264 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Effectiveness of Electro-acupuncture and Manual Therapy on Pain and Fucntion in Patients With Sciatica
NCT04764890 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Management of Post-operative Pain Following Cesarean Delivery
NCT01383122 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Rhythmical Massage Compared With Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback in Women With Menstrual Pain (Dysmenorrhea)
NCT03712800 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Radio-frequency in Patients With Myofascial Chronic Neck Pain
NCT02353195 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RF/PEMF Versus Ultrasound for the Treatment of Soft Tissue Injury
NCT03774823 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Myofascial Release Therapy for TMD Pain: A Randomized Trial
NCT05673642 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA