Dry Needling Versus Conservative Treatment in the Rectus Femoris Muscle Approach.

NCT04968236 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90

Last updated 2024-02-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In recent years, dry needling techniques have become widespread in the field of musculoskeletal pain treatment. Specifically, the management of myofascial trigger points has been the focus of these techniques.

One of the objectives has been to improve the flexibility of those muscles that, due to the presence of myofascial trigger points, had a decrease in this parameter.

This study aims to determine whether the application of a dry needling technique is more effective than analytical stretching of the muscle.

Conditions

  • Dry Needling
  • Stretch
  • Rectus Femoris Muscle

Interventions

OTHER

Deep Dry Needling

In-and-out into different directions technique to encounter sensitive spots in an MTrP region.

OTHER

Superficial Dry Needling

This technique involves inserting a needle at a depth that is into the subcutaneous tissue and may be combined with manipulation of the needle while in situ.

OTHER

passive stretching

Type of stretching in which you stay in one position for a set time. In this case, hip extension and knee flexion.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Alcala

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-08-30
Primary Completion
2023-12-15
Completion
2024-02-05

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04968236 on ClinicalTrials.gov