MedTrace Logo

RF/PEMF Versus Ultrasound for the Treatment of Soft Tissue Injury

NCT03774823 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 10

Last updated 2021-01-22

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The study will investigate whether the impact of PEMF and RF therapies is safe and efficacious for the treatment of pain associated with soft tissue injuries as compared to treatment with ultrasound, and to show the effects of PEMF and RF therapies on range of motion and blood flow associated with soft tissue injuries as compared to ultrasound therapy.

Conditions

  • Soft Tissue Injuries

Interventions

DEVICE

RF and PEMF

RF and PEMF treatment is deployed using either a small or large handpick applied to the skin and moved slow random patterns homogeneously over the area of treatment

DEVICE

Ultrasound

Ultrasound is applied to the subject by placing a probe on the treatment area and moving it rapidly and homogeneously over the treatment area

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Venus Concept

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Andrea Biro · Venus Concept

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-08-13
Primary Completion
2019-03-31
Completion
2019-07-31
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03774823 on ClinicalTrials.gov