Cost-effectiveness of RFA vs. PEI for Early-stage HCC
NCT06450613 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2024-06-10
Summary
Introduction: Liver transplantation(LT) is the gold-standard treatment for unresectable early-stage HCC within the Milan criteria. However, long waiting time can lead to dropout from LT candidacy. Local ablative procedures play a key role in the patient care enabling downsizing. Radiofrequency ablation(RFA) and percutaneous ethanol injection(PEI) are two valuable non-surgical neoadjuvant alternatives, but the most cost-effective treatment strategy remains controversial. Purpose: to assess whether RFA is cost-effective compared to PEI in adult patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria. Methods: a pilot, single-center, randomized, open-label trial, with blinded end-point assessment, in which PEI was compared with RFA. Patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria, listed for LT and indication for neoadjuvant treatment were eligible for enrollment. The primary outcome was the complete response rate according to mRECIST criteria at 60 days after the treatment. Secondary outcomes were the costs, rates and degrees of complications and the cost-effectiveness analysis of both techniques.
Conditions
- Cost Effectiveness
- Exposure to Radiofrequency
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
radiofrequency ablation
HCC Radiofrequency ablation
- OTHER
-
percutaneous ethanol injection
HCC percutaneous ethanol injection
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Guilherme Mariotti · Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2020-10-31
- Completion
- 2021-03-31
Countries
- Brazil
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Bipolar RFA Using Twin ICW Electrodes vs. Switching Monopolar RFA for Recurrent HCC
NCT03806218 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Patients With Liver Cancer and Cirrhosis
NCT00132041 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Session Combined Locoregional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT02646137 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Radiofrequency Ablation With or With Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT00554905 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Microwave and Radiofrequency Ablation for Liver
NCT02539212 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Microwave Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma as Compared to Radiofrequency Ablation
NCT01340105 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Alone for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT01415063 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Standard Treatments of Very-early Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT02728193 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Combine TACE and RFA Versus RFA Monotherapy in Unilobar HCC of 3.1 to 7 cm Patient
NCT01858207 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
TACE as an Adjuvant Therapy After Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT00556803 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
RFA Versus SBRT for Recurrent Small HCC
NCT04047173 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) Associated With Postoperative TACE
NCT00730860 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Liver Resection Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT02755311 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
RFA+Highly-purified CTL vs. RFA Alone for Recurrent HCC
NCT02678013 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Factors Affecting Post-treatment Outcomes in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT04553458 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Malignant Liver Tumors Closed to Intrahepatic Vessels
NCT03063840 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
TACE+RFA Versus TACE Alone for Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT02435953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Computer-assisted Tumor Ablation for Patients With Liver Cancer
NCT03630068 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Downstaging Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Resectable Disease With Combined Immunotherapy and Stereotactic Beamed Radiotherapy: a Pilot Study
NCT07305428 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Combine TACE and RFA Versus TACE Alone for HCC With PVTT
NCT02301091 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison Between Radiofrequency Ablation and Hypofractionated Proton Beam Radiation for Recurrent/Residual HCC
NCT01963429 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Unresectable, Small (≤ 3 cm) HCC
NCT05433701 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
To Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Microwave Ablation Therapy in Patients With Primary Liver Cancer
NCT04520906 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
TACE+RFA Versus Re-resection for Recurrent Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT01833286 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Liver Resection for Elderly Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Within the Milan Criteria
NCT01570075 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4