Bipolar RFA Using Twin ICW Electrodes vs. Switching Monopolar RFA for Recurrent HCC

NCT03806218 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 77

Last updated 2020-04-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study was conducted to provide preliminary data for the main trial to compare efficacy between bipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using twin internally cooled-wet electrodes and switching monopolar RFA using separable clustered electrodes in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after locoregional treatment.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Bipolar RFA

Bipolar RFA in which RF currents flow between two electrodes

DEVICE

SM-RFA

Monopolar RFA using multiple electrodes with switching mode

DEVICE

Twin internally cooled-wet electrodes

Saline-enhanced twin internally cooled electrodes allow intratumoral injection of a saline solution during the application of the RF current that alters the tissue conductivity

DEVICE

Separable clustered electrodes

A separable clustered electrode is similar to a clustered electrode, although it differs from a conventional clustered electrode in that each individual electrode is separable.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jeong Min Lee, MD · Seoul National University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-05-16
Primary Completion
2018-05-16
Completion
2019-02-12

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03806218 on ClinicalTrials.gov