RFA+Highly-purified CTL vs. RFA Alone for Recurrent HCC
NCT02678013 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 210
Last updated 2016-02-23
Summary
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Recurrence of tumor within the liver remnant is common, with a reported 5-year recurrence rate of 70%. Repeat hepatectomy is an effective treatment for intrahepatic HCC but with a small proportion of resection rate because of the poor functional liver reserve and postoperative complications. Radiofrequency ablation(RFA) is becoming the main effective treatment for small HCC (≤5.0cm). The efficacy of RFA for recurrent HCC has been reported to be comparable to those achieved by surgery with minimal, but higher local recurrence rate after RFA. It has been reported that immunotherapy in patients who underwent curative treatment for HCC, adjuvant immunotherapy with activated CIK cells increased recurrence-free and overall survival. But there is little evidence for adjuvant immunotherapy of recurrence HCC. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes(CTL), a kind of effective T cells that specific recognizing and killing antigen targeted cells through cloning amplification after receiving antigen information from antigen presented cell and playing key role to clear cancerous cells. So our hypothesis is that RFA combined with immunotherapy (Highly-purified CTL) is superior to RFA for recurrent HCC. The aim of this prospective study is to compare the outcome of RFA combined with immunotherapy (Highly-purified CTL) with RFA for small recurrent HCC after partial hepatectomy.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
RFA
Radiofrequency ablation(RFA)for small recurrent HCC
- PROCEDURE
-
RFA+highly-purified CTL
Radiofrequency ablation(RFA) plus highly-purified CTL for small recurrent HCC
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ming Kuang
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Ming Kuang, Ph.D. · First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-02-29
- Primary Completion
- 2020-01-31
- Completion
- 2022-01-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Alone for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT01415063 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Resection+Highly Purified CTL Versus Resection Alone for HCC
NCT02709070 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Radiofrequency Ablation Accompanied With Spontaneous Sorafenib in Early to Intermediate Stage HCC
NCT02187081 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
No-touch RFA Versus Traditional RFA for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT02830737 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Downstaging Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Resectable Disease With Combined Immunotherapy and Stereotactic Beamed Radiotherapy: a Pilot Study
NCT07305428 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study Comparing Radio Frequency Ablation Plus Chemotherapy and Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With Secondary Liver Metastases
NCT00510627 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Combined Treatment of RFA and Sorafenib on Recurrent HCC
NCT01470495 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Radiofrequency Ablation in Treating Patients With Liver Cancer (Hepatocellular Carcinoma)
NCT01669668 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Radiofrequency Ablation Plus Systematic Neoadjuvant Therapy for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma (RANT Study)
NCT05277675 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
TACE+RFA Versus TACE Alone for Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT02435953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Bipolar RFA Using Twin ICW Electrodes vs. Switching Monopolar RFA for Recurrent HCC
NCT03806218 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Combination Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Greater Than 3 cm
NCT00479050 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Radiofrequency Ablation Assisted Hepatectomy Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT01713244 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immune Profile and Prognosis of Malignant Liver Tumors With Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) Therapy
NCT04707547 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cytokine Change in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Thermal Ablation
NCT04555265 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiofrequency Ablation Plus Radiotherapy for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT03988998 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Single Session Combined Locoregional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT02646137 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Unresectable, Small (≤ 3 cm) HCC
NCT05433701 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Recombinant Human Adenovirus Type 5 in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
NCT03790059 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Neoadjuvant HAIC and PD-1 Plus Adjuvant PD-1 for High-risk Recurrent HCC
NCT06467799 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Effectiveness of Microwave Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma as Compared to Radiofrequency Ablation
NCT01340105 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) Associated With Postoperative TACE
NCT00730860 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Toripalimab and Lenvatinib in the Treatment of Short-term Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
NCT05162898 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of AKR1B10 as a New Marker for Interventional Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT06272656 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Hepatectomy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Adjacent to Major Blood Vessels
NCT00814242 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3