Comparison of Rotating vs. Fixed Platform of the COLUMBUS Knee Prosthesis

NCT00822640 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2013-05-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

A population of 100 patients randomised to rotating and fixed PE inlays in the Columbus knee prosthesis received a navigated TKR. Knee Society Score as primary endpoint, Oxford Score, and postoperative ROM after one year will be compared.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Total Knee Arthroplasty

All patients receive the same posterior cruciate retaining implant but the tibial tray and bearing (B. Braun Aesculap Columbus CR and RP) by two experienced surgeons and will follow an identical rehabilitation regime.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Aesculap AG

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Frank Lampe, MD · Schön Kliniken Klinikum Eilbek

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Max Age
90 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2004-03-31
Primary Completion
2007-06-30
Completion
2008-07-31

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00822640 on ClinicalTrials.gov