MedTrace Logo

L-PRF Versus A-PRF on Palatal Wound Healing

NCT06242314 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 36

Last updated 2024-02-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Different approaches are used to reduce post-operative complications associated with the palatal wound site after free gingival graft (FGG) harvesting. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of L-PRF and A-PRF on palatal wound healing after free gingival graft harvesting and patients' quality of life.

Conditions

  • Palate; Wound

Interventions

PROCEDURE

L_PRF

Palatal epithelialization, pain (Visual Analog Scale (VAS) recording), analgesic tablet use and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire scores were recorded after L-PRF placing on palatal wounds

PROCEDURE

A-PRF

Palatal epithelialization, pain (Visual Analog Scale (VAS) recording), analgesic tablet use and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire scores were recorded after A-PRF placing on palatal wounds

PROCEDURE

Palatal stent

Palatal epithelialization, pain (Visual Analog Scale (VAS) recording), analgesic tablet use and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire scores were recorded after palatal stent placing on palatal wounds

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Izmir Katip Celebi University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-01-10
Primary Completion
2022-03-22
Completion
2022-10-24

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06242314 on ClinicalTrials.gov