Omega Gastric Bypass (150cm) Compared to the Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (YOMEGA-2 Multicentric Trial)
NCT06057597 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 368
Last updated 2026-02-27
Summary
Obesity with its consequences such as type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, dyslipidemia, fatty liver disease, sleep apnea and cancers, remains a major healthcare problem worldwide. Bariatric surgery, combined with nutritional education and close monitoring, has been shown to be the most effective treatment for patients with morbid obesity resulting in significant and lasting weight loss and improvements in co-morbidities . With nearly 50000 procedures per year France ranks third in the world in terms of care for patients suffering from morbid (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²) and severe (BMI 35-40 kg/m²) obesity.
In parallel with the significant increase in the number of patients operated on for obesity in the world, over the past two decades, significant development has been observed in the field of bariatric surgery with a decrease or even disappearance of some procedures and the appearance of others.
Performed for more than 40 years, the Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) is a restrictive and malabsorptive procedure and currently is considered as gold standard procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity and its comorbidities. However, despite the good effectiveness (with an average Excess Weight Loss % (EWL%) of approximatively 70% at 2 years), RYGB is technically demanding procedure with learning curve requiring more than 100 cases and an overall complication rate ranging from 10% to 20% Introduced in 2001, one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a modified gastric bypass that consists of a single gastrojejunal anastomosis between a long gastric pouch and a jejunal (biliopancreatic) omega loop. In Sept. 2019, taking into account the results from YOMEGA trial, the French High Authority for Health (Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS)) recommended to ban OAGB with 200 cm or longer BPL and urged to assess the efficacy and safety of OAGB with 150 cm BPL in a randomized controlled trial. Indeed, YOMEGA-2 trial is logical continuity of the YOMEGA trial.
The aim of this study is to assess weight loss efficiency and the nutritional safety of the OAGB-150 in comparison to a standard (RYGB).
The hypothesis of this study is that the OAGB with a 150 cm BPL could have the same efficacy on weight loss and nutritional complication rate in comparison to the RYGB at 2 years.
Conditions
- Obesity
- Morbid
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic OAGB
It is a gastric bypass surgery with a unique gastro-jejunal anastomosis, a long (11-14cm) and narrow (3-4cm) gastric pouch will be created by applying one horizontal 45-mm stapler at the angle of lesser curvature, just above the left branch of the crow's foot, and then four to five vertical 60-mm staple cartridges will be placed upwards to the angle of His, and calibrated along a 32-Fr bougie. Sectioning of the greater omentum into a bivalve will be performed. The jejunum will be measured using pre-measured strip and amounted antecolically at 150 cm from the ligament of Treitz. An end-to-side anastomosis will be performed with the gastric pouch, using a 45-mm linear stapler and an anterior running suture to close gastro-enterotomy.
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic RYGB
A small gastric pouch (30cc) will be created using a linear stapler. The alimentary limb will be moved up into an antecolic position after an epiploic transection so as to perform the gastro-jujunal anastomosis. The gastro-jejunostomy will be performed manually or using a linear or circular stapler. An alimentary limb of 150 cm and a biliary limb of 50cm will be measured (using premeasured strip) in order to perform the latero-lateral jejuno-jejunal anastomosis using a linear stapler. All mesenteric defects (Petersen's space and mesenteric defect) will be closed with a non-absorbable running suture
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Tigran POGHOSYAN, MD-PhD · Bichat (APHP)
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-11-13
- Primary Completion
- 2028-10-01
- Completion
- 2028-12-01
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Long-term Adverse Effects of Gastric Bypass in Omega
NCT04930029 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Regain Rate According to gj Anastomosis Size in Gastric Bypass
NCT05655975 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of One-anastomosis Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Type 2 Diabetes Remission
NCT05015283 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effects on Remission of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Following Gastric Bypass Alone vs Gastric Bypass Combined With Truncal Vagotomy
NCT07278115 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing 150cm OAGB With 150cm Biliopancreatic Limb RYGB. A Non-inferiority Trial
NCT04852198 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini-Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en Y Gastric Bypass
NCT03045679 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Long Biliopancreatic Limb RYGB on Weight Loss and Comorbidities
NCT01686997 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT02475590 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Surgery Versus Best Medical Management for the Long Term Remission of Type 2 Diabetes and Related Diseases (REMISSION)
NCT02390973 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Gastric Bypass With Different Lengths of the Bilipancreatic Limb
NCT05334173 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comorbidity After Gastric Bypass
NCT02710786 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Evaluation of the Fundoplicature of the Excluded Stomach Post Omega Bypass
NCT06621979 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Using Argon Plasma Coagulation in Weight Regain in Patients Following Gastric Bypass
NCT05149105 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Long Alimentary Limb or Long Biliary Limb Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Type 2 Diabetes Remission in Severely Obese Patients.
NCT03821636 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity
NCT01806506 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Weight Loss Following Gastric Bypass or Sleeve Surgery
NCT02070081 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Sleeve Gastrectomy Failure Using Single-anastomosis Metabolic Surgery
NCT05242835 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study on Metabolic Surgery Compared to the Best Clinical Treatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT01821508 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Outcomes of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass As Revisional Procedures Following Failed Restrictive Bariatric Surgery
NCT06794892 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Clinical Trial
NCT04649619 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Extended Pouch Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Study
NCT02218957 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
NCT01984762 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between Short vs. Long Biliopancreatic Limb Gastric Bypass
NCT04609449 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass vs. Lifestyle Modification and Medical Therapy in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes
NCT01231308 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Revision of Vertical Banded Gastroplasty to Gastric Bypass
NCT01041131 ·Status: COMPLETED