Five-year Migration Pattern and Bone Mineral Density for the Tri-Lock and Summit Femoral Stems.
NCT06019026 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 52
Last updated 2023-09-28
Summary
The incidence of primary hip joint prosthesis is 180 per. 100,000 inhabitants. In male patients younger than 50 years the 10-years survival of the prosthesis is 89 % and 82 % over 15 years. In women younger than 50 years the 10-years survival of the prosthesis is 87 % and 78 % over 15 years.
As revision surgery is associated with higher complication risk for the patient and poorer out-come and implant survival it is necessary to examine possible methods that may increase long-term survival of the primary hip prosthesis or facilitate better outcomes after revision of hip joint prostheses for younger patients.
In younger patients the prosthesis often is inserted without the use of cement. When not using cement, it is crucial for the final result, that there is a direct bone ingrowth of the prosthesis. The chance of getting bone ingrowth depends firstly on a good immediate mechanical fixation at surgery and secondly on osteoconductive abilities of the prosthetic surface.
This study investigates a new bone sparing implant with a new surface compared to a conventional implant.
Conditions
- THA
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Tri-Lock
Implant Stem
- DEVICE
-
Summit
Implant Stem
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Regional Hospital Holstebro
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Torben Bæk Hansen, MD, PhD · Gødstrup Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2017-08-31
- Completion
- 2023-06-10
More Related Trials
-
Stability of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Implants Using Radiostereometric Analysis
NCT01668160 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Cementing Techniques of the Femoral Component in a Hip Prosthesis
NCT01952067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dual Mobility in "High Risk" Patients
NCT04092634 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Comparison Hip Resurfacing Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)
NCT01359527 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
NCT00913679 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cementation of Cup and the Risk of Second Revision
NCT06583382 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Femoral Remodeling Following Total Hip Arthroplasty With OMNI Apex Modular™ and OMNI Apex ARC™ Stem Compared to Competitive Designs
NCT01359540 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparative Study of the Wear of Uncemented Acetabular Conventional Polyethylene and X3 in Total Hip Replacement, for Stereo-radiographic Analysis
NCT02525770 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
"True Incidence of Hip Dislocation After Primary THA - a Nationwide Population Study"
NCT03859791 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Cemented TrendHip® - Multicenter PMCF Study on Total Indications
NCT04943328 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Uncemented Compared to Cemented Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT02247791 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Versus Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing in Young Active Patients
NCT00285129 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Femoral BMD Change Following Cemented or Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06733597 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Metal Ion Levels in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) With Modular Dual Mobility Cup Compared to Conventional THA
NCT05181566 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Metal-metal Articulations Versus Standard 28 mm Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01113762 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Radiographic Changes and Clinical Implications of Implantation of Shortened Uncemented Femoral Stems in THA
NCT05666284 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
RCT Comparing the DEXA Results of the HA-Omnifit Versus the Symax Uncemented Hip Stem
NCT01695213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density Changes After Implantation Of A Short Hip Stem Compared To A Straight Stem
NCT03147131 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Incidence of Dual Mobility Polyethylene Wear in Total Hip Prosthesis. Randomised Study Versus Fixed Insert by Radiostereometric Analysis.
NCT02525809 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Clinical Follow-up of the Echo Bi-Metric Microplasty Stem for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT04326010 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Lubinus SPII Hip Stem Target Trial Emulation
NCT06367829 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Importance of Hollow or Solid Centralizer for Polished, Collarless and Tapered Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT01918540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
AMIStem-H Radiographic Analysis
NCT02829866 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Anterior Minimal Invasive Surgery Versus Antero-lateral Approach in Hip Joint Hemiarthroplasty
NCT05255198 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Metal on Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Metal on Metal Total Hip Resurfacing.
NCT04516239 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4