Relevant Outcome Measures for Creatine Transporter Deficiency Patient

Summary

Creatine transport deficiency (CTD) is a rare genetic disorder related to pathogenic variants in the SLC6A8 gene, located on chromosome Xq28. Clinical diagnosis of CTD is based on clinical presentation, an increased urinary creatine/creatinine ratio and a severe decreased creatine peak on 1H-MRS magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

A retrospective study with questionnaires identified that most CTD patients had moderate to severe intellectual disability. Less than one third of patients were able to speak in sentences. Seizures were present in 59% of the patients. 41% had autistic features. Motor dysfunction was mentioned in 58%, and gastrointestinal symptoms were reported in 35% of the patients.

Several new therapeutic avenues are currently emerging in this disease for which no treatment has been available until now : cyclocreatine (interesting but unfortunately with very little clinical applicability due to its toxicity; dodecyl creatine ester incorporated into lipid nanocapsules with intranasal administration; pharmaco-chaperoning (for the folding-deficient creatine transporter variants, Ultragenyx pharmaceuticals new prodrug designed to deliver creatine to the brain (UX068). These new pharmacological treatment options may offer future opportunities to improve cognition in CTD patients.

A key issue is to determine outcome measures that are accessible to these patients, despite the importance of their cognitive deficit. In a preliminary study (on 31 CTD patients), investigators showed for example, that 75% of patients were unable to perform a Wechsler scale, which is one of the most used neuropsychological test to determine patient IQ (intelligence quotient). Most of the existing cognitive tests were developed to distinguish typically developing persons and ID (intellectual disability) patients, leading to a floor effect in the latter who systematically fail these tests. Therefore, these tests are not adapted to capture the potential effect of a drug in ID patient group. The identification of reliable and sensitive outcome measures for use in clinical trials in ID patients was recognized as a priority in a meeting convened by the NIH. N-of-1 trials (also called Single-Case Experimental Designs or SCEDs) appear of great interest for rare diseases, statistical power coming from the number of repeated measures, which leads to choose outcome measures that can be repeated multiple times.

This innovative study will allow to efficiently preparing future therapeutic trials, by specifying the phenotype of the patients, and by determining the most adapted outcome measures taking into account their cognitive deficiency and the type of experimental design to be used in the context of rare diseases.

Conditions

• Creatine Transporter Defect

Interventions

OTHER

Clinical endpoints

1. Number of epileptic seizures 2. Change in antiepileptic treatment (increase or decrease) 3. Visual analogical scale on a target symptom defined with the parents, 4. CGI, 5. Actimetry data over 24 hours, 6. Podometry data over 24 hours, 7. 6 minutes' walk test, 8. Clinical examination 9. Feasibility of performing an MRI without any anesthesia on a mock scanner

OTHER

Parental questionnaires

10- Adaptive assessment with Vineland Adaptive Behavior scale II, 11- Mac Arthur questionnaire regarding language, 12- Pervasive Development Disorder in Mentally Retarded persons Scale (PDD-MRS), 13- Dunn sensory profile, 14- Aberrant Behavior Checklist, 15- Nisonger Child Behavior Rating form, 16- Social Responsiveness Scale 2, 17- Scales assessing the impact on primary caregiver (CBI-M/ Beach Center Family QOL)

OTHER

Quality of life scale

18- Quality of life scale (PedsQL 4.0 for children or San Martin scale if the patient is older than 18)

OTHER

Cognitive assessments

19- Leiter 3 scale (4 cognitive sub-tests to be able to compute the non-verbal IQ and 2 non-verbal memory sub-tests) or Bayley 4 if Leiter 3 is not possible 20- CPM-BF 21- Simple reasoning task on tablet (match-to-sample task) 22- Implicit rules learning (modified Brixton), 23- 4 sub-tests from the WPPSI-IV ("zoo location" to assess spatial memory, "block design" to assess visuo-constructive abilities, "bug search" , "cancellation"), 24- Attention assessment (4 sub-tests from KITTAP: alert, go/no go, flexibility, divided attention), 25- Elementary visuo-spatial perception (on tablets)

OTHER

Language assessments

26- EXALANG 3-6 (10 sub-tests testing for expressive and receptive language assessments), 27- PPVT-5 (receptive vocabulary), EVT-3 (expressive vocabulary), 28- Automatic language analysis (during a 10 minutes interaction, play).

OTHER

Motor assessments

29- Kinematic task (specifically designed), 30- Purdue-Pegboard test, 31- Renzi test

OTHER

Social assessments

32- Eye-tracking analysis of social visual scenes and social preference index (movies), 33- theory of mind assessment, 34- ADOS scale (Autism Spectrum Disorder), 35- sensitivity to inequality, 36- pro-social behaviors (help of the psychologist)

OTHER

3T MRI

37- Structural, metabolic and functional data

OTHER

Cardiac assessments

38- ECG 39- Ultrasound

OTHER

Biological collection

40- Blood sample 41- Urinary sample 42- Superficial skin biopsy

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Hospices Civils de Lyon

  lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation

NON_RANDOMIZED

Purpose

OTHER

Masking

NONE

Model

PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age

2 Years

Max Age

60 Years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start

2023-03-13

Primary Completion

2026-12-13

Completion

2026-12-13

Countries

• France

Study Locations