EnSeal Device Versus Ferguson Technique in Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT00853853 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2012-11-20
Summary
This study will compare hemorrhoid surgery by comparing a sutureless heating device with the old standard hemorrhoid surgery. Patients will be followed closely for wound healing and satisfaction.
Hypothesis: The sutureless device will be less painful for the patient and easier for the surgeon to perform.
Conditions
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
EnSeal Device
Hemorrhoidectomy using the EnSeal Device, which is an instrument cuts and seals with heat energy leaving a sutureless wound, which heals with security against bleeding.
- PROCEDURE
-
Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy technique
The closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy technique is a gold standard operation that has been in existence for 50 years. This operation is done under general or intravenous sedation, and the operating surgeon uses a special clamp to go across the hemorrhoidal complex followed by excision of the hemorrhoid. Sutures that dissolve (such as 3.0 vicryl) are then placed at the root of the hemorrhoid, securely tied, and then run about the clamp. The clamp is removed and then the suture tightened, then the suture line is reinforced. This can be done from 1-3 hemorrhoidal groups at a single time.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ethicon, Inc.
collaborator INDUSTRY -
Steven Schechter, M.D.
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Steven Schechter, MD · The Miriam Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2012-12-31
- Completion
- 2012-12-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Minimally Invasive Open Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy Compared to Conventional Open Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy: a Clinical Trial
NCT06764849 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation and Rectoanal Repair Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
NCT01647763 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mucopexy Versus Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty for the Treatment of Hemorrhoidal Disease
NCT04881344 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Symptom Control 1-year After Circular Stapler Anopexy or Diathermy Excision for Prolapsed Haemorhoids
NCT00841620 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Study About Patient Comfort and Long-term Outcome After Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
NCT01533363 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Treatment of Perirectal Fistula With Cutting Seton vs. Collagen Plug
NCT00450671 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison Study of Surgical Staplers for the Treatment of Hemorrhoids
NCT01306877 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Short-term Outcomes of Using DST and PPH Staplers in the Treatment of Grade III and IV Hemorrhoids
NCT04058223 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison Study: Ligasure Versus Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy in III and IV Degree Hemorrhoids.
NCT03848468 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
LigaSure Hemorrhoidectomy Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
NCT01097759 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety and Efficacy Study of HET Bipolar System for Treatment of Stage I and Stage II Hemorrhoids
NCT01841970 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
HELO Trial: Energy-Based Therapies vs. Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy for Grade III Hemorrhoids
NCT07333040 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Recto-Anal-Repair in the Treatment of Advanced Haemorrhoidal Disease
NCT01301209 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Minimal Invasive Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty vs Conventional Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy in II-III Grade Hemorrhoidal Disease
NCT04944407 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Rubber Band Ligation and Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy for the Treatment of Grade II-III Internal Hemorrhoids: a Multicenter, Non-randomized Controlled Study
NCT06794151 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Stapled Anopexy Versus Closed Haemorrhoidectomy for Haemorrhoids
NCT00397137 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Doppler-guided Haemorrhoidal Artery Ligation With Suture Mucopexy vs. Suture Mucopexy Alone
NCT02372981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Surgisis AFP to Advancement Flap for the Repair of Anal Fistulas
NCT00545441 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hemorrhoid Artery LigatioN Without Doppler Trial
NCT04119401 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Implementation of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Grade III Hemorrhoids
NCT06851312 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Hemorrhoids: Options of Traditional Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT06132152 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Thrombosed External Hemorrhoids: Comparison of the Thrombectomy and Local Excision Procedures in Terms of Results and Outcome (TEH)
NCT03903536 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Clinical Study on Alleviating Hemorrhoids-related Symptoms of Pelvic Radiation Therapy
NCT07175584 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radiofrequency Ablation vs Doppler-guided Haemorrhoidal Artery Ligation in the Treatment of Haemorrhoidal Disease
NCT06170736 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Decompression and Drainage Seton for Treatment of High Horseshoe Anal Fistula
NCT05044182 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA