Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Inflexible Laparoscopic Instruments and Laparoscopy: a Single-Center Experience
NCT06708390 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 1000
Last updated 2025-03-27
Summary
Since being introduced by Mühe in 1985, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has garnered global acceptance and defined as gold standard treatment for benign gallbladder diseases (BGDs). Minimally invasive surgery technique was applied in a spectrum of surgeries including LC, namely single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), initially reported by Navarra in 1997. By then this technique developed dramatically in aspects of both operation and instruments. Previous experiences with SILC across various centers have consistently demonstrated its robust safety and feasibility. Numerous clinical trials have highlighted the benefits of SILC over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC), particularly in terms of promoted aesthetic outcomes, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stays.However, discrepancies in postoperative complications including incisional hernias have sparked debate regarding the merits and drawbacks of SILC. Consequently, further research is urgent with larger cohorts and extended postoperative follow-up periods for a definitive assessment of SILC.
In the present study LC was performed in cases from January 2023 to March 2024, aiming to compare the overall outcomes and complications between CLC and SILC. All surgical instruments and laparoscopy were introduced through a single intraumbilical incision in SILC group, allowing the resultant scar to be discreetly concealed within the reconstructed navel. Furthermore, historical implementations of SILC have predominantly utilized specialized and novel instruments. This reliance on special equipment limited the technique's applicability and benefits in settings with more rudimentary clinical facilities. The authors successfully applied conventional laparoscopic instruments and a 10mm laparoscopy with straight and inflexible properties and simplified the surgical process. Moreover, the single-incision port used were made on site from basic stuffs and materials easily obtained from operation room.
Conditions
- Benign Gallbladder Disease
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Daren Liu, MD, PhD · Chief Physician
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-11-23
- Primary Completion
- 2025-02-17
- Completion
- 2025-02-20
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of "Pick'n Roll" Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Technique, and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02149797 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Setting ERCP and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is a Safe Procedure in Patients With Cholecysto-Choledocholithiasis
NCT04213092 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Drainage or Not for Laparoscopic Cholecystetomy
NCT03909360 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01195285 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial of Single Incision Versus Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02375529 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00678873 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00981604 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Incisional Hernia Rate After Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT03768661 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Children. Risk Factors for Conversion. A Prospective Study .
NCT06048029 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison of Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Three Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01772745 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of the Inflammatory Reaction in Standard vs Single Port Cholecystectomy for Uncomplicated Cholelithiasis
NCT01116492 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SILS Cholecystectomy: Cholangiography of the Biliary Tract
NCT01056250 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Drainage in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02027402 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery vs Flexible Single Incision Surgery for Cholecystectomy
NCT01558414 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Treatment of Choledocolithiasis by Laparoscopic Exploration
NCT04690101 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Feasibility and Safety of a Three-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using a 2-mm Mini-Instrument
NCT01571479 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cholecyst- Versus Cystic Duct Cholangiography During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01103570 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
SILS™ Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Post Market Study
NCT00832767 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Does Using a 5 mm Telescope in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Reduce the Incidence of Trocar Site Hernia?
NCT04279223 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Techniques: Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy IN Benign Gallbladder Disease
NCT07119203 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
ERCP Plus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Cholecystectomy
NCT05901363 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy:
NCT04107909 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Multicenter Human Randomized Controlled Evaluation of NOTES® Cholecystectomy
NCT01171027 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoendoscopic Rendez Vous Versus Standard Two Stage Approach for the Management of Cholelithiasis/Choledocholithiasis
NCT00416234 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery: Laparoscopic-Assisted Transvaginal Cholecystectomy
NCT00910325 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2