Comparison of an Acceleromyography- and Electromyography-based Neuromuscular Monitor With TOF-Watch ® Monitor
NCT05632107 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2026-04-03
Summary
A quantitative neuromuscular monitoring device is desirable to titrate the depth of neuromuscular block (NMB) during a procedure, and to prevent residual effects after removal of the endotracheal tube. Unfortunately, the most widely used monitoring technique acceleromyography (AMG) typically implies a series of cumbersome installation and calibration procedures that frequently precludes correct use of these devices in clinical practice. Electromyography (EMG) has recently attracted a lot of attention as an alternative strategy to compensate for the deficiency of AMG-based neuromuscular monitors. Nowadays, a new technology that allows for the simultaneous acquisition of EMG and AMG signals is commercially available. Although its reliability has been rapidly accepted in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, the use of the technique in neuromuscular monitoring has never been reported. The aim of the present study is to assess the validity of the new device for estimating the neuromuscular block by comparing with TOF Watch®-SX, which is the most widely accepted AMG-based neuromuscular monitor that has been practiced in the clinical arena for decades.
Conditions
- Neuromuscular Blockade
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
TOF-Watch®;DELSYS® Wireless surface EMG
TOF-Watch® is the most widely accepted AMG-based neuromuscular monitor; and DELSYS® Wireless surface EMG is a new technology that allows for the simultaneous acquisition of EMG and AMG signals in a wireless manner.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Hua Zheng, Dr. · Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 90 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-03-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-12-31
- Completion
- 2027-12-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of McGrath Series 5 and Airtraq Videolaryngoscope for Double-lumen Tube (DLT) Intubation
NCT02329041 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Recovery Between NIVATS and Intubated Patients
NCT03711461 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Among Three Different Video Scope Guided Nasotracheal Intubation.
NCT05534451 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Ambu®AuraGain™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Normal Airway Patients
NCT03108391 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Flexible Fibreoptic Scope With Pentax AWS Videolaryngoscope for Ease of Intubation During Awake Intubation
NCT02614924 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
For Nasotracheal Intubation With Video Rigid Stylet, Which Nostril is Better?
NCT05218590 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Univent Tube for Thoracoscopic Thymectomy in Myasthenic Patients
NCT06101407 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Endotracheal Intubation Over the Aintree Via the I-gel and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme
NCT02476565 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ease of I-gel Insertion With Two Different Techniques in Adults
NCT04109898 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Location of Laryngeal Mask With Air Leakage Test
NCT04390893 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Suction Catheter as a Guide for Nasotracheal Intubation Under General Anesthesia
NCT05717907 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Digital Intubation (Two-finger) and Video Laryngoscopy
NCT04414839 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Intubating Condition of the Mcgrath Videolaryngoscope With and Without Muscle Relaxant
NCT02575716 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Comparison Between Rigid Video Assisted Laryngoscopy vs Flexible Laryngoscopy in Anticipated Difficult Intubation
NCT04628611 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Applying High Resolution Impedance Manometry for Perioperative Swallowing Changes in Older Patients Receiving Endotracheal Intubation or Supraglottic Airway Devices During Orthopedic Surgery
NCT05420428 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Early Endotracheal Tube Insertion With GlideScope Use
NCT01564082 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Efficiency Between I-gel Blind Intubation and I-gel Bronchoscopic Intubation During Resuscitation
NCT02411422 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tongue Root Retractor For Fibroscopic Intubation
NCT04343014 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Atomization Vs. Nebulization for Airway Topicalization During Awake Nasotracheal Fiberoptic Intubation
NCT05320731 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
An Efficacy of Simulator Training for Fiberbronchoscopy in Intensivists
NCT05248347 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Techniques for Tracheal Tube Exchange in Standard and Critical Care Patients
NCT04158271 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngoscope Versus CMAC for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Emergent Airway Management
NCT01710891 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Magnetically Guided Endotracheal Intubation and Airway Cleaning Robot System
NCT04327076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Different Tools to Facilitate Nasotracheal Tube Placement Under Video-laryngoscope Use
NCT03086798 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect-site Concentration of Remifentanil for Double-lumen Tubes Intubation: Airtraq VS Macintosh Laryngoscope
NCT03653910 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA