Evaluation of the Value of Perianal Infiltration During Thermodestruction of Haemorrhoidal Disease by Radiofrequency
NCT05519189 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 134
Last updated 2026-01-21
Summary
Haemorrhoidal disease is a common and benign condition (1). Anatomically, there is an external and internal component. Only internal haemorrhoidal disease is managed by radiofrequency. Different levels of severity of internal haemorrhoidal disease have been defined by the Goligher classification (1). According to the recommendations for clinical practice established by the French National Society of ColoProctology (SNFCP), grade I and II haemorrhoidal disease should be managed instrumentally after failure of medical treatment. Grade III and IV haemorrhoidal disease is an indication for surgical management in the first instance or after failure of instrumental treatments. The standard technique is the Milligan and Morgan procedure (pedicle haemorrhoidectomy) described in 1937 (2). This technique consists of the removal of the 3 internal haemorrhoidal bundles. It remains the most effective but is responsible for postoperative complications, in particular pain, haemorrhage, anal strictures and anal incontinence (3), (4). Less aggressive techniques have been developed (Longo technique, HAL-RAR technique). The Longo technique is a circular stapling haemorrhoidopexy. The haemorrhoidal packets are brought up into the anal canal with the help of a circular aggravating forceps removing a collar of rectal mucosa. This removal of the mucosa also allows the vascularisation of the haemorrhoidal venous network to be interrupted. The HAL- RAR technique is a non-resection technique consisting of arterial ligation of the haemorrhoidal packets in order to interrupt the vascularisation supplying the haemorrhoidal packets. This technique can be performed with or without Doppler guidance. Recently, Renshaw et al. described a technique for coagulation of haemorrhoidal bundles using a radiofrequency probe (5).
This technique has shown satisfactory results and is an interesting option in the management of haemorrhoidal disease (6) with low postoperative pain (7).
In order to limit patients' postoperative pain and reduce their apprehension during defecation episodes, a perianal block has been shown to reduce postoperative pain in patients with a haemorrhoidectomy technique (8,9). In 2019, a prospective randomised trial (10) confirmed the value of this perianal block without a neurostimulator during a haemorrhoidal pack resection procedure. A perianal infiltration of 40 ml of 0.5% Ropivacaine was performed. These 40ml were divided into 4 injections of 10ml each in the left and right antero-lateral position and in the left and right postero-lateral position in relation to the anal margin.
The hemorrhoidal pack resection technique is known to induce postoperative pain. Haemorrhoidal radiofrequency (RAFAELO® procedure) is a new minimally invasive technique that reduces postoperative pain and is usually performed on an outpatient basis (6). Currently, peri-anal infiltration is routinely performed for all haemorrhoidal surgery whether or not there is a haemorrhoidal resection. No studies have evaluated the relevance of maintaining peri-anal infiltration in non-resected haemorrhoidal surgery and in particular during radiofrequency haemorrhoidal packets. In addition, ropivacaine infiltration is not without risks. Local anaesthesia has potential risks for the patient:
* Adverse reaction or hypersensitivity to local anaesthetics and components
* Infection at the injection site or infiltration
* Haematoma at the injection or infiltration site The aim of our study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of discontinuing perianal infiltration in patients with thermodestructive haemorrhoidal surgery.
Conditions
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Ropivacaine
Peri-anal infiltration of Ropivacaine
- OTHER
-
Failure to perform peri-anal ropivacaine infiltration
Failure to perform peri-anal ropivacaine infiltration
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Centre Hospitalier Departemental Vendee
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Emeric ABET · Centre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée
-
Farouk DRISSI · Nantes University Hospital
-
Yann REDON · Clinique Mutualiste de l'Estuaire
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-01-10
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-16
- Completion
- 2026-01-15
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Multicenter Prospective Evaluation of Radiofrequency for Anal Fistulas
NCT03131297 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility of Superior Rectal Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Hemorrhoidal Disease
NCT02303925 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Technique LHP (Laser HemorrhoidoPlasty) in Haemorrhoidal Prolapse Mini Invasive Surgery
NCT03322527 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ligasure Versus Diathermy Haemorrhoidectomy Under Local Anesthesia
NCT00617448 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Outpatient Hemorrhoidectomies at the Paris Saint Joseph Hospital Group
NCT05177016 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Longitudinal Description of Hemorrhoidal Pathology
NCT04945408 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
aCute HemORrhoidal Disease evALuation International Study
NCT04578730 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Radiofrequency Treatment for Pilonidal Disease : Safety of Use, Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction at 6 Months
NCT05855733 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trans-anal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (THD) vs. Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT01244672 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Analgesic Efficacy of an Ultrasound-guided Transperineal Pudendal Block in Outpatient Hemorrhoidal Surgery
NCT07015775 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mucopexy Versus Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty for the Treatment of Hemorrhoidal Disease
NCT04881344 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Doppler-guided or Non Doppler-guided Arterial Ligation and Mucopexy for Third Degree Hemorrhoids: That is the Question
NCT03729414 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Multicenter Prospective Trial on Hemorrhoids
NCT03245086 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Recurrence Rate of Hemorrhoidal Disease at 10 Years and More After HAL Doppler or HAL-RAR Intervention
NCT04731064 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Superior Rectal Mucosal Ligation and Hemorrhoids Ligation
NCT06649786 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Perianal Nerval Block in Proctological Interventions
NCT03405922 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Transarterial Coil Embolization of the Superior Rectal Arteries for Treatment of Stage II Hemorrhoids
NCT03805087 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ligation and Hemorrhoidopexy Technique Versus Ligation of Hemorrhoidal Arteries Using Ultrasound for Hemorrhoids
NCT03298997 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Single and Triple Rubber Band Ligation for the Treatment of Hemorrhoids
NCT01383577 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hemorrhoid Artery LigatioN Without Doppler Trial
NCT04119401 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Minimal Invasive Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty vs Conventional Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy in II-III Grade Hemorrhoidal Disease
NCT04944407 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Two Treatment Methods Compared the Sclerosing Agent Injection and the Rubber Wrapping
NCT05089500 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Fissurectomy to Fissurectomy With Anoplasty
NCT04911023 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Transanal Doppler-guided Arterial Ligation With Mucopexy and Stapled Haemorrhoidopexy
NCT01240772 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Longo's Intervention in the Treatment of Hemorrhoids and Rectal Mucosal Prolapse
NCT03383926 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA