Weaning Success in Different Weaning Strategies in Early Neurological Rehabilitation Patients - a Matched-pair Analysis

NCT05483244 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2022-08-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To enable weaning from mechanical ventilation, two different strategies may be distinguished: continuous weaning and discontinuous weaning. There is a lack of evidence of the superiority of one of both strategies is currently weak among early neurological rehabilitation patients. To the best of our knowledge, only one study including stroke patients compared different weaning strategies and showed a significantly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation during continuous than during discontinuous weaning, which is in contrast to the results of the largest weaning study with patients on medical-surgical intensive care units. In addition, further inconsistent results were reported from studies with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, which might be due to disease duration and/or duration of prior mechanical ventilation in the acute care hospital.

This small number of studies with controversial results indicates that there is a considerable need for further research. The current study intended to compare the rehabilitation outcome of early neurological rehabilitation patients, weaned by different strategies (continuous vs. discontinuous) through a matched-pair analysis.

Conditions

  • Neurologic Disorder
  • Respiratory Insufficiency

Interventions

OTHER

discontinuous weaning

Each day, a respiratory therapist evaluated whether a spontaneous breathing trial could be performed. Patients of the discontinuous weaning group were disconnected from the respirator during the spontaneous breathing phases which could then take place via heat moist exchanger, high-flow therapy and/or speaking valve without pressure support by the respirator (spontaneous breathing trial with heat moist exchanger). Heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure and mental condition of the patient (i. e. stress, fear) were monitored carefully for five to ten minutes and the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index was calculated. If the patient could keep the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index stable under 105/min/l (without a significant increase) over five minutes, the spontaneous breathing trial was regarded as successful and the weaning could be started. The duration of spontaneous breathing trial was extended according to the individual situation of the patient.

OTHER

continuous weaning

Each day, a respiratory therapist evaluated whether a spontaneous breathing trial could be performed. In the case of continuous weaning, spontaneous breathing trial was supported by the respirator, but the positive endexpiratory pressure was lowered to an individual level (between 5 and 10 mbar) resulting in very little pressure support (spontaneous breathing trial trial under continuous positive airway pressure condition). Heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure and mental condition of the patient (i. e. stress, fear) were monitored carefully for five to ten minutes and the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index was calculated. If the patient could keep the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index stable under 105/min/l (without a significant increase) over five minutes, the spontaneous breathing trial was regarded as successful and the weaning could be started. The duration of spontaneous breathing trial was extended according to the individual situation of the patient.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • BDH-Klinik Hessisch Oldendorf

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Simone B Schmidt, Dr. · BDH-Klinik Hessisch Oldendorf

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-11-20
Primary Completion
2022-01-28
Completion
2022-07-01

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05483244 on ClinicalTrials.gov