MedTrace Logo

Follow-up Automatically vs. As-Needed Comparison (FAAN-C) Trial

NCT05471908 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 2674

Last updated 2025-12-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Compare the effectiveness of automatic vs as-needed (PRN) post-hospitalization follow-up for children who are hospitalized for common infections.

Conditions

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

As-needed follow up

At hospital discharge, participant receives a recommendation for PRN follow-up. Recommendation informs participant that scheduling a follow-up visit is not needed at discharge and suggests that participant follow symptoms after discharge to decide if a visit is ultimately needed or not.

BEHAVIORAL

Automatic follow-up

At hospital discharge, participant receives a recommendation for automatic follow-up. Recommendation instructs participant to schedule a follow-up visit and attend the visit even if symptoms get better.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

    collaborator OTHER

  • University of Utah

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Eric Coon, MD · University of Utah

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Max Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-08-22
Primary Completion
2027-02-28
Completion
2028-02-28

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases
Companies

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05471908 on ClinicalTrials.gov