Prospective Pilot ATOMS vs AUS
NCT05464316 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2022-07-19
Summary
Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence (PPI) is a common complication affecting 1% to 40% of patients after surgery. When conservative treatments fail, the installation of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) has been the treatment of choice for PPI since its introduction more than 50 years ago. Although small studies suggest inferior success rate of male slings compare to the AUS in moderate to severe male incontinence; recent studies, one prospective and one Canadian multicenter cohort study, have demonstrated adjustable transobturator male sling (ATOMS) as a safe and efficient alternative to treat PPI. Interestingly, the ATOMS does not required any operation manipulation from the user in order to void and it causes potentially less urethral erosion and less urethral atrophy than the AUS; although those findings were never compared head to head with the AUS. Therefore, we believe that a thorough prospective non-inferiority study comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of the ATOMS device versus the AUS in treating moderate to severe PPI could prove itself useful in guiding urologists and patients to choose their best treatment of male incontinence. The null hypothesis posed for the present study is that ATOMS is non inferior to AUS for the treatment of moderate to severe PPI using the non-inferiority margin of 15% to be of acceptable lower effectiveness.
With regards to study methods, this will be a pilot prospective, randomized controlled trial, non-blinded with a non-inferiority design. This pilot study will take place at the CIUSSS de l'Estrie, in Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, with two surgeons. All male patients with moderate to severe incontinence after their prostate surgery, who are suitable for incontinence surgery will be screened for study eligibility respecting the exclusion and inclusion criteria. After written informed consent, enrolled patients will be randomized assigned (1:1) to one of the two interventions' arms (AUS or ATOMS). Sixty patients are estimated to be randomized in the two arms the day of their surgery with a computer-based algorithm sequence.
By completing this pilot prospective study, we hope to provide concrete and scientifically significant evidence on the effectiveness of ATOMS in the treatment of moderate to severe PPI comparing with the AUS. Although both treatments are commonly used today, there has been little evidence comparing both devices side by side with more severe PPI. We therefore hope to make a global impact with said project.
Conditions
- Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence
- Urinary Stress Incontinence
- Urinary Incontinence
- Stress Incontinence, Male
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Adjustable Transobturator Male System
The ATOMS sling was developed in 2008 by Agency for Medical Innovations GmbH in Austria. It is a self-anchoring adjustable system which supports the bulbar urethra dorsally and uses the trans obturator approach. This device gained its fame in the male sling scene by being adjustable, which theoretically makes it more efficacious than its competitors.
- DEVICE
-
Artificial Urinary Sphincter
The AMS800™, which is by far the most frequently implanted AUS, was first marketed in 1983 and was developed by America Medical Holdings in Minnesota. Today, the AUS has been given the title "gold standard" for surgical treatment for PPI. This device is an inflatable cuff which wraps around the urethra to supply circumferential pressure. It has a control pump, which is found in the scrotum and is operated by the patient. The patient can void simply by squeezing the pump, which brings the fluid from the cuff to a reservoir and release the pressure around the urethra. The cuff is then automatically refilled with fluid within a couple of minutes to close back the sphincter.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Université de Sherbrooke
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-01-13
- Primary Completion
- 2024-01-13
- Completion
- 2025-01-13
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
I-STOP TOMS - Trans Obturator Male Sling
NCT00442078 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
ProACT Therapy for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Males
NCT00277095 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Adjustable Artificial Sphincter Victo in the Treatment of Male Incontinence Due to Prostate Surgery
NCT06239909 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
AMS AdVance and AdVance XP Male Sling Systems for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence Following Prostatectomy: Evaluation of Safety, Efficacy, and Quality of Life Through Retrospective Chart Review and Prospective Follow-up
NCT01725984 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Impact of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Technique on Short-term Continence Recovery
NCT02352103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Feasibility Study of A VoRo UrologIc ScaffolD (ARID)
NCT06275945 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Urinary Diversion After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
NCT02108431 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Perfusion Sphinterometry and Autologous Sling to Improve Urinary Continence in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
NCT03050996 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Trial to Compare Urinary Continence Recovery After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Rhabdosphincter Reconstruction.
NCT03302169 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study of Intra-operative Autologous Retropubic Urethral Sling on Urinary Control After Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
NCT01821209 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pelvic Floor Muscle Training and Biofeedback or Standard Therapy in Men Who Have Undergone Radical Prostatectomy or Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
NCT00632138 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Effects of Action Observation Training (AOT) in the Achievement of Urinary Continence in Men After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP)
NCT05311267 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of External Electric Stimulating in Individuals With Urinary Incontinence After Prostatectomy
NCT05127447 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Perineal Ultrasound in Men Before and After Radical Prostatectomy
NCT03037008 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Urinary Bladder Hypertrophy on Urge Urine Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy
NCT03061760 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Early Urinary Continence After Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical Procedure and Anatomic Landmarks
NCT04043637 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective RCT on Post Prostatectomy Urine Leak
NCT02367404 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Impact of Maximal Urethral Length Preservation Technique During Robotic Laparoscopic Prostatectomy on the Stretched Flaccid Penile Length and Continence
NCT05735223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Urodynamic Feasibility Study Utilizing the UroLift® System
NCT04271020 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Male Stress Urinary Incontinence and Sexual Health
NCT01379378 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Effects of Transcutaneous Perineal Stimulation Versus Anal Stimulation
NCT03587402 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
AdVance® vs ARGUS® Sling Procedure in Male With Post Prostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT01866085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Extracorporeal Magnetic Stimulation, Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise, and Combination of Both in Management of Post Radical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence
NCT05680168 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Does Posterior Reconstruction of the Rhabdosphincter Improve Early Recovery of Continence After Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy?
NCT01809522 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Prevention of Post Operative Urinary Retention After Thoracic Surgery Trial
NCT06262048 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2