Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Urinary Diversion After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

NCT02108431 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 160

Last updated 2014-04-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of the study is to determine, whether the urinary diversion via suprapubic cystostomy compared to transurethral catheterization after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy superior the postoperative patient comfort and reduce the postoperative bacteriuria.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

balloon catheter for suprapubic bladder-drainage

suprapubic tube removal was allowed when the anastomosis was watertight, Day 5

DEVICE

balloon catheter for transurethral bladder-drainage

transurethral catheter withdrawal was allowed when the anastomosis was watertight, Day 5

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • St. Antonius Hospital Gronau

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jawid Habibzada, MD. · St. Antonius Hospital Gronau

  • Michael Godes, MD. · St. Antonius Hospital Gronau

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-02-28
Primary Completion
2013-10-31
Completion
2013-11-30

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02108431 on ClinicalTrials.gov