MedTrace Logo

Effects of Transcutaneous Perineal Stimulation Versus Anal Stimulation

NCT03587402 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 70

Last updated 2020-10-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study evaluates whether surface perineal stimulation is as effective as anal stimulation in reducing urinary incontinence secondary to radical prostatectomy.

Half of participants will receive a treatment with surface perineal stimulation, while the other half will receive a treatment with anal stimulation.

Conditions

Interventions

OTHER

Transcutaneous perineal stimulation

Surface stimulation

OTHER

Anal stimulation

Intra-cavitary stimulation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • RAPbarcelona

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Regina Pané · RAPbarcelona

  • Inés Ramírez · RAPbarcelona

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-02-01
Primary Completion
2019-07-30
Completion
2020-10-06

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03587402 on ClinicalTrials.gov