Exploring the Impact of Individualized Pleasure-Oriented Exercise Sessions in a Health Club Setting

Summary

A call for an exercise prescription aiming at pleasure promotion has been proposed by several authors. This entails that current exercise prescription guidelines are heavily focused on a dose-response relation derived from an effectiveness (e.g., fitness gains) and safety of the prescription (e.g., reduced risk of injury for the general population) standpoint. Despite its relevance, this bipartite or biomedical approach (e.g., rationale for a given dose of a drug and expected outcome) tends to overlook other relevant variables that are needed for, for example, behavior maintenance, or individual preferences. Although some flexibility of this rationale may account for personal differences, how to adequately adjust the training variables to individual characteristics is still poorly explored or even expressed.

The call for a tripartite exercise prescription reflects the bout of evidence that supports the relevance of pleasurable experiences in exercise and their impact on adherence. Thus, besides an effective and safe program, contemplating how to assess and promote exercise-related pleasurable experiences are paramount. As stated in 2011 on the ACSM position stand, affect-regulation did not behold the necessary evidence to be a primary method of exercise prescription, although affect assessment (e.g., through the feeling scale) was proposed to be relevant for exercise intensity self-regulation. A decennial look at the ACSM exercise guidelines shows that although presenting an advancement in affect-related behavioral strategies and theories, no clear indications on operational instruments for assessment and admeasurement of affect are presented depicts a barrier to an adequate advancement in this matter. This can be seen, for example, in ACSM principles for exercise prescription (Frequency, Intensity, Time, and Type; FITT). Although supporting the use of affect regulation for exercise promotion and maintenance, the FITT is not based on a previous (e.g., preexercise evaluation) or in-session affective assessment, and more importantly, does not address how to adjust exercise prescription/supervision aiming to improve the pleasure/displeasure relation.

Conditions

• Affect

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

General exercise prescription (FITT)

The (1) control group (FITT) will receive a preexercise evaluation and 3 individualized training sessions based on the ACSM and FITT principles (ACSM, 2021). These are the procedures commonly used for apparently healthy individuals that start to exercise in health clubs.

BEHAVIORAL

Affective regulation (AFFECT)

As for the (2) experimental group (AFFECT), the focus will be given to exercise intensity assessment and manipulation. The same preexercise evaluation, number of individualized sessions, and methodological approach (i.e., FITT) will be made. However, individual preferences and experiences regarding exercise intensity will be assessed in the preexercise evaluation. These will be used to select the exercise sessions' initial intensity. Moreover, intensity self-selection guidance and affective response assessments will be made throughout the session for continuous intensity adjustments (aiming for pleasurable feelings).

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Grupo Lusófona

  lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

• Diogo S. Teixeira, PhD · Grupo Lusófona

Study Design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

OTHER

Masking

SINGLE

Model

PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age

18 Years

Max Age

45 Years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start

2022-08-01

Primary Completion

2022-11-24

Completion

2022-11-24

Countries

• Portugal

Study Locations