Evaluating Mechanisms of Action of Adaptive Goal-Setting for Physical Activity

NCT04505241 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 36

Last updated 2021-04-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Behavior modification programs hold promise for increasing levels of physical activity (PA) for individuals who are insufficiently active. However, existing interventions, which typically prescribe uniform PA goals across participants, are limited by their insensitivity to changing individual needs and circumstances over time. An alternative approach is to continuously adjust goal difficulty to match fluctuations in individual performance, or adaptive goal-setting (AGS), which evidence suggests may more effective for increasing PA than non-adaptive approaches. Still, no prior studies have examined the psychological mechanisms targeted by AGS, which limits the ability to further refine and disseminate this technique. In this exploratory study, several candidate mechanisms of AGS (expectancy beliefs about goals, perceived value of goals, affective appraisal of goals, implicit attitudes towards exercise) will be examined. Adult participants interested in increasing their level of physical activity (N = 36) will be randomized to receive 6 weeks of either adaptive goal-setting (AGS) or non-adaptive, static goal-setting (SGS) as part of a remote, low-intensity PA intervention. The primary aim of the study will be to evaluate the hypothesis that AGS, as compared to SGS, results in greater increases over time to four hypothesized psychological mechanisms. The secondary aim will be to evaluate whether post-intervention increases to any among these three mechanisms mediate the relationship between intervention type (AGS vs. SGS) and increases to PA over the course of the intervention.

Conditions

  • Motivation
  • Physical Activity Promotion
  • Behavior Change
  • Mobile Health

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Remotely-delivered physical activity promotion

Over video-call, participants will receive educational content on safely increasing their levels of physical activity (e.g., selecting an appropriate form of exercise, minimizing health risks, the importance of planning), will receive daily text messages (see arm descriptions) for six weeks and complete a 10-15 minute check-in call at the 3-week point of the intervention to assess compliance with daily step goals as well as to help problem-solve barriers to compliance.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Drexel University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-09-21
Primary Completion
2021-02-01
Completion
2021-04-01

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04505241 on ClinicalTrials.gov