Dose Finding Study of Remimazolam for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion
NCT05298228 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 25
Last updated 2022-03-28
Summary
Laryngeal mask airways (LMA) are widely used in patients receiving general anesthesia and are known to have the following advantages over the endotracheal tube: lower incidence of postoperative sore throat, lower incidence of cough during emergence, and lower incidence of postoperative vomiting. Although LMAs can be inserted without the use of muscle relaxants, a sufficient depth of anesthesia is necessary for placement. Remimazolam is a newer anesthetic that is ultra-short acting with a rapid onset and short context-sensitive half-life allowing for fast recovery. However, the dose of remimazolam needed for LMA insertion without muscle relaxants is not well known. This dose-finding study aims to find the ED50 and ED95 of a single bolus dose of remimazolam for LMA insertion without muscle relaxants in adult patients.
This is an interventional study done in a single group using the Dixon's up-and-down method which requires at least six success/failure pairs in the same direction. The primary endpoint of this study is to investigate the dose of remimazolam associated with 50% (ED50) and 95% (ED95) probability for adequate depth of anesthesia for LMA insertion without muscle relaxants. The beginning dose of remimazolam is 0.3 mg/kg, and when LMA insertion is successful, the dose will be decreased by 0.05 mg/kg in the next patient. When LMA insertion is unsuccessful (failed), the dose will be increased by 0.05 mg/kg in the next patient. Successful LMA insertion is defined as symmetrical chest wall movement and square-wave capnographic traces observed with manual ventilation.
Conditions
- Orthopedic Surgery
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Remimazolam bolus does administration
The beginning dose of remimazolam is 0.3 mg/kg, and when LMA insertion is successful, the dose will be decreased by 0.05 mg/kg in the next patient. When LMA insertion is unsuccessful (failed), the dose will be increased by 0.05 mg/kg in the next patient.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Yonsei University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 19 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2023-07-26
- Completion
- 2023-07-27
Countries
- South Korea
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Intubation Using Video Laryngeal Mask and Video Laryngoscope in Elective Surgical Patients
NCT07057908 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Safety and Efficacy of Laryngeal Mask Airways in Sinonasal Surgery
NCT02311153 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme Versus Laryngeal Tube
NCT02252120 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Neuromuscular Block in Laryngeal Mask Airway(LMA) Insertion
NCT01035021 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect-site Concentration of Remifentanil for Smooth Removal of the Double-lumen Endotracheal Tube
NCT02528825 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Learning Curve of Video Laryngeal Mask Airway (Video-LMA) Use in Airway Management by Anesthesiology Residents
NCT07057921 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of Differences in Video Laryngeal Mask Airway and Fastrack Laryngeal Mask
NCT06121895 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Comparison of LMA-Supreme and I-gel for the Incidence of Postoperative Sore Throat
NCT02745964 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Insertion of Laryngeal Mask Airways and Postoperative Sore Throat
NCT06713343 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison of Airway Sealing With the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Supreme at Different Intracuff Pressure in Children
NCT01738854 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
the Effective Bolus Dose of Remifentanil for Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Insertion in Children
NCT01919203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Supreme LMA and Endotracheal Intubation Use in Caesarean Section
NCT01858467 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Endotracheal Intubation Over the Aintree With Fiberoptic Bronchoskop Via the I-gel and LMA Protector
NCT03501602 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Muscle Relaxants and Laryngeal Local Anesthetics for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Decreasing Propofol in Elderly
NCT05310110 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
I-Gel Versus Disposable Laryngeal Mask (LMA) for General Anesthesia (GA) With Controlled Ventilation
NCT00668278 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SaCoVLM™ Video Laryngeal Mask Versus LMA Supreme
NCT06245668 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Usage of LMA Protector on Patients Who Undergo Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT03453138 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Relationship Between Optimal Laryngeal Mask Airway Cuff Volume and Physical Examination of Head and Neck
NCT02502422 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Lidocaine and Remifentanil for the Effect on Responses to the Endotracheal Tube During Emergence From General Anesthesia
NCT01082458 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Nasopharyngeal Versus Laryngeal Mask Airway in Anaesthesia for Bilateral Blepharoplasty
NCT03510949 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Head Elevation on LMA Insertion
NCT04229862 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Insertion of I-gel and Classic LMA in Different Head Positions in Elderly Patients
NCT07027293 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Supreme Versus Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airways in Infants
NCT03251105 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Muscle Relaxants on Efficacy of LMA Insertion
NCT03487003 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficiency of Classical and I-GEL LMAs Selected by Different Methods in Providing a Safe Airway
NCT05430425 ·Status: UNKNOWN