Direct Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulator Parameter Settings

NCT05283863 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 4

Last updated 2024-05-21

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

(Primary)

1. To compare the clinical effects and side effects of two different stimulation strategies that do not produce any sensory percept (1000 Hz and placebo) on clinical benefit for electrodes implanted for chronic pain as measured by the Visual Analog Pain Scale for back and leg pain, the Brief Pain Inventory, the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire.

(Secondary)
2. To compare the clinical effects of the subthreshold (paresthesia-free) stimulation patterns with conventional (paresthesia-producing) stimulation patterns to evaluate the necessity of paresthesias and current amplitudes on clinical benefit for pain.
3. To identify the ability of subthreshold high-frequency to improve axial pain or the affective component of pain.

Conditions

  • Spinal Cord Stimulation
  • High-frequency Stimulation
  • High-density Stimulation

Interventions

DEVICE

High-frequency stimulation

Patients in this group will receive sub-threshold high-frequency (aka 1200Hz) spinal cord stimulation for 2 weeks.

DEVICE

Sham Stimulation

Patients in this group will receive receive sham spinal cord stimulation (aka no stimulation) for 2 weeks.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Case Western Reserve University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jennifer A Sweet, MD · University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-06-30
Primary Completion
2015-08-31
Completion
2015-08-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05283863 on ClinicalTrials.gov