Patient Preference and Long-term Outcomes in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Study Comparing Spinal Cord Stimulation to Intrathecal Drug Delivery.

NCT07091123 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 36

Last updated 2026-02-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) or intrathecal drug delivery (pain pump) can be effective in providing pain relief for patients with low back pain who have not responded to other treatments. While both treatments, SCS and pain pump, may help with low back pain relief, it is not known which treatment may work better for patients. SCS and pain pumps involve an implanted device in the body.

In this study, we are asking patients to undergo a trial of both treatment modalities, SCS and pain pump, as screening tests prior to considering an implant. A total of 36 patients will be enrolled in this study. After both trials are completed, participants will be seen in the office and asked which treatment modality they believe has been more effective for relieving pain during the trial periods by completing questionnaires. If neither treatment was effective in improving baseline pain by at least 50%, participants would not qualify for either implant whether or not they are part of this study. Direct study participation would end here. If either or both treatment modalities improved baseline pain by at least 50%, participants will be asked to choose the treatment that worked better: SCS or pain pump. Participants will then have the option to proceed to the permanent implant of choice: SCS or pain pump. Direct study participation would end here but participants will then be followed in the doctor's office after implant as is customary for usual clinical care. The study data collection will conclude when the screening tests are completed.

Conditions

  • Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome

Interventions

DEVICE

Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS)

Two spinal cord stimulation leads will then be advanced under fluoroscopy to the target area, typically around T7-T9 in the posterior epidural space. Currently, there are six manufacturers of spinal cord stimulation devices with implanted programmable generators or receivers.

DEVICE

Pain pump

Spinal catheter place under local anesthesia.

DRUG

Bupivacain 0.625%/Fentanyl 2mcg/ml

A solution containing fentanyl 2 mcg/mL and bupivacaine 0.625 mg/mL at an infusion rate of 0.5 ml/hr.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Salim Hayek, MD · University Hospitals

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
30 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-10-13
Primary Completion
2027-08-11
Completion
2027-08-11
FDA Drug
Yes
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07091123 on ClinicalTrials.gov