Robotic vs. Conventional Minimal-invasive Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT05216276 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 182
Last updated 2025-01-28
Summary
Minimal invasive techniques have become a well established approach for inguinal hernia repair over the last decade in developed countries. Different techniques such as total extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) have been described. These studies show comparable results in short and long term outcome. Robotic inguinal hernia surgery enables an even more precise dissection within the preperitoneal layer thus preserving the nerves of the lateral abdominal wall. This may translate into a reduced level of acute and chronic postoperative pain as previously reported by retrospective case series. The role of robotic surgery for inguinal hernia repair in regard of postoperative pain and recovery has not been investigated in randomized and blinded clinical studies yet. With this randomized and blinded trial the investigators compare robotic TAPP (rTAPP) to conventional TEP with a decreased pain level shortly after surgery as primary outcome (numeric rating scale - NRS). A reduced postoperative NRS for pain may translate into faster recovery and less chronic pain, secondary endpoints include comparison of pain in a longer course (short-form inguinal pain questionnaire (sf-IPQ)), quality of life / health status (Baseline Short Form-12 (SF-12), Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS)), complications (Comprehensive Complication Index - CCI), rate of recurrence, , economic impact in terms of costs of surgery per patient, for the institution, the sick leave and the cost-effectiveness of health intervention (SF-6D, EQ-5D, ICECAP-O). Also included are ergonomics for the surgeon (NASA TLX).
Conditions
- Hernia, Inguinal
- Robotic Surgical Procedures
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
TEP
Laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair
- PROCEDURE
-
rTAPP
robotic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Clarunis - Universitäres Bauchzentrum Basel
collaborator OTHER -
St. Claraspital AG
collaborator OTHER -
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Fiorenzo V Angehrn, Dr. med. · Clarunis AG
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-01-17
- Primary Completion
- 2024-12-31
- Completion
- 2025-12-31
Countries
- Switzerland
More Related Trials
-
Functional Outcome After Groin Hernia Mesh Repair: Open Versus Laparoscopy
NCT00625534 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Prospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic and Open Incisional Hernia Repair: a Multicenter Cohort Study
NCT01280370 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Endoscopic eTEP Versus Open Rives-Stoppa
NCT05446675 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pain and Quality of Life After Inguinal Hernia Repair: Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair.
NCT04211142 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Open Preperitoneal Surgery With Polysoft Mesh Versus a Classic Open Surgery With Light Weight Mesh
NCT00323674 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Whole Mesh and Split Mesh Use in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT05420376 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Self-Fixating vs Non-Fixating Hernia Mesh
NCT02062775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Repair of Groin Hernias After Abdominal Prostatectomy With Robotic TAPP
NCT04718597 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Telescopic Dissection vs. Balloon Dissection During Laparoscopic TEP Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03276871 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of the 3DMax™ MID Anatomical Mesh (BD, USA) in Laparoscopic-endoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair - Multicenter, Prospective Observational Study
NCT07289802 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
TAPP and Open Repair for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia
NCT06604572 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
TEP Versus Open Minimal Suture Repair for the Sportsman's Groin
NCT02297711 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair- Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Versus Totally Extra Peritoneal (TEP)
NCT00687375 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
TAPP Inguinal Hernia Repair With Self-fixating Parietex™ ProGrip™ Mesh
NCT01481376 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
ExtrAperitoneaL Plasty vs Intraperitoneal oNlay mEsh in Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT06367309 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D vs 2D HD Laparoscopy in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT02367573 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Recurrent Inguinal Hernia Treatment - Lichtenstein Versus Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty
NCT00642200 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Mesh Implantation for the Prevention of Incisional Hernia
NCT01203553 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03904888 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Results After Endoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair of Recurrent Inguinal Hernia
NCT00683098 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Lap TAP Block for Laparoscopic TEP Inguinal Hernia Repair: a Prospective, Double-blinded, Randomized, Clinical Trial
NCT02632136 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Does a Transabdominal Plane Block Decrease Patient Pain After Ventral Hernia Repair?
NCT02007096 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical Trial to Compare TAPP (Transabdominal Preperitoneal) vs TEP (Totally Extraperitoneal) y Approach for Women's Inguinal Hernia on an Outpatient Basis
NCT04114344 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Lichtenstein Versus TAPP and TEP in Groin Hernioplasty
NCT02928146 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Study to Compare the Clinical Outcomes, Pain and Patient Quality of Life for Hernia Patients
NCT02715622 ·Status: COMPLETED