MedTrace Logo

Single-centre Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy

NCT05110573 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 172

Last updated 2021-11-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is increasingly performed. However, technical challenges and a perceived higher risk of complications has hindered wide adoption of a minimally invasive approach.

This is a retrospective comparison of a prospectively kept database. The investigators compared surgical outcomes and survival after laparoscopic (LPD) versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD). In order to reduce the effect of bias and confounding, baseline characteristics of both groups were matched using propensity score matching.

Conditions

  • Pancreatic Neoplasms

Interventions

PROCEDURE

pancreatoduodenectomy

Patients included in the cohorts all underwent pancreatoduodenectomy, open or laparoscopic

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • General Hospital Groeninge

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mathieu D'Hondt, MD · 1. Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery AZ Groeninge

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2000-01-01
Primary Completion
2020-01-31
Completion
2021-03-20

Countries

  • Belgium

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05110573 on ClinicalTrials.gov