Comparing Total Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy

NCT03138213 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 656

Last updated 2020-10-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Introduction Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is one of the most complex abdominal operations to perform, and it is usually conducted for tumours of the periampullary region and chronic pancreatitis. Minimally invasive surgery has been progressively being developed for pancreatic surgery, first with the advent of hybrid-laparoscopy and recently with total laparoscopic surgery. Issues including the safety and efficacy of total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (TLPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) are currently being debated. Studies comparing these two surgical techniques are emerging, and large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking but are clearly required.

Methods and analysis TJDBPS01 is a multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled, parallel-group, superiority trial in fourteen centres with pancreatic surgery experts who have performed ≥104 TLPDs and OPDs. A total of 656 patients who will undergo PD are randomly allocated to the TLPD group or OPD group in a 1:1 ratio. The trial hypothesis is that TLPD has superior or equivalent safety and advantages in postoperative recovery compared with OPD. The primary outcome is the postoperative length of stay (LOS).

Ethics and dissemination The Instituitional Review Board Approval of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology has approved this trial and will be routinely monitoring the trial at frequent intervals, as will an independent third-party organization. Any results from this trial (publications, conference presentations) will be published in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

PROCEDURE

Open pancreaticoduodenectomy

Open pancreaticoduodenectomy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Shandong Provincial Hospital

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University

    collaborator OTHER
  • The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing

    collaborator OTHER
  • Hunan Provincial People's Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • The First Hospital of Jilin University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

    collaborator OTHER
  • The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

    collaborator OTHER
  • Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College

    collaborator OTHER
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Henan Provincial People's Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Tongji Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-05-01
Primary Completion
2022-05-01
Completion
2022-05-01

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03138213 on ClinicalTrials.gov