GOODBYE HARTMANN TRIAL: 100 YEARS OF HARTMANN'S PROCEDURE
NCT04829032 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 500
Last updated 2021-04-02
Summary
Hartmann's procedure was described for the first time in 1921 as an alternative to abdominoperineal resection for the treatment of upper rectal tumours.
Although Hartmann's procedure fell out of favour for rectal cancer after the introduction of restorative procedures, it remained the most common procedure in emergency setting for many years. Nowadays Hartmann's procedure is a useful procedure in selected cases e.g. severely ill patients with a high risk of anastomotic failure. However, restoring intestinal continuity for Hartmann patients is often associated with high morbidity, and about 70% will live with a permanent colostomy. Hartmann procedure' is a rapid and simple surgical technique intended to decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality. This technique is often performed by young surgeons Indeed, end colostomy may be necessary in situations where restoration of continuity is risky, either because of unfavorable local conditions or because a more definitive resection must be aborted due to hemodynamic instability. In the last decade the Hartmann's procedure has been revalued in many studies. In diverticular disease the results of DIVA arm of the LADIES trial showed that more patients in the primary anastomosis group were stoma free compared with patients in the Hartmann's procedure group. Other studies have observed no differences in major postoperative complications or postoperative mortality between patients undergoing primary anastomosis versus Hartmann's procedure.
Hartmann's procedure reversals were associated with a higher risk of serious postoperative complications than were stoma reversals after primary anastomosis with ileostomy.
Despite the growing evidence in favour of primary anastomosis and its inclusion as a valid treatment option for perforated diverticulitis or perforated sigmoid colon in recent clinical practice guidelines, some surgeons have been hesitant to undertake anastomosis in the setting of purulent or faecal contamination and continue to choose Hartmann's procedure to eliminate concerns about anastomotic leakage.
Conditions
- Emergencies
- Colon Disease
- Colo-rectal Cancer
- Volvulus Colon
- Intussusception
- Diverticulitis
- Foreign Bodies
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Hartmann's procedure
Hartmann's procedure
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Fausto Catena
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Gennaro Perrone
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Parma University Hospital
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-03-01
- Primary Completion
- 2021-05-31
- Completion
- 2022-05-31
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Efficacy of Human Acellular Dermal Matrix in the Treatment of Anal Fistula
NCT00951002 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Transanal Doppler-guided Arterial Ligation With Mucopexy and Stapled Haemorrhoidopexy
NCT01240772 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Recto-Anal-Repair in the Treatment of Advanced Haemorrhoidal Disease
NCT01301209 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ligation of Inter-sphincteric Fistula Tract for Management of Anal Fistula
NCT05314205 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Incidence and Risk Factors of Parastomal Hernia in Patients With Permanent Colostomy in China
NCT05061589 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Long Term Outcomes After Surgery for Anal Fistula
NCT04588701 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
FOAM: Functional Outcome After Ventral Mesh Rectopexy
NCT06455501 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) Procedure Versus Use of an Anal Fistula Plug for Anal Fistula Repair
NCT00830661 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Traditional Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy vs Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
NCT05959577 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Lower Transsphincteric Perianal Fistula: Fistulotomy With Marsupialization vs Open Wound
NCT04722965 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Injection of Autologous, Activated and Emulsified Fat in Chronic Fistulas of the Gastrointestinal Tract and Pelvic Organs
NCT06930079 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Treatment of Perirectal Fistula With Cutting Seton vs. Collagen Plug
NCT00450671 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Recto Anal Repair or Milligan Morgans Operation of Grade 3 and 4 Symptomatic Haemorrhoidal Disease
NCT01038141 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Modified Technique to Facilitate Pealing of the Rectal Mucosa in Delorme Operation
NCT02901210 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transanal Haemorrhoidal Dearterialisation Versus Stapler Haemorrhoidopexy
NCT01615575 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conservative Treatment of Gastrointestinal Fistulas by Endoscopic Injection of tSVFem
NCT04670276 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Evaluation of Hemorrhoidal Surgery Outcome in Istanbul
NCT05429060 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Re-routing in Treatment High Anal Fistula
NCT05476146 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Adipose Tissue Injection for the Treatment of Complex Cryptoglandular Perianal Fistula
NCT04790123 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Stem Cells Treatment for Extremely Complex Fistulae (HULPCIR)
NCT01586715 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Minimal Invasive Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty vs Conventional Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy in II-III Grade Hemorrhoidal Disease
NCT04944407 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Anal Fistulae Internal Opening Closure by OTSC Clip After Video Assisted Tract Fulguration
NCT06243302 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Comparison Between Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy and Haemorrhoidal Dearterialisation With Anopexy
NCT01263431 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Transarterial Coil Embolization of the Superior Rectal Arteries for Treatment of Stage II Hemorrhoids
NCT03805087 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Anal Fistulas Advancement Flap
NCT01042821 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA