MedTrace Logo

Scalpel Versus Diathermy Skin Incision in Repeated CS

NCT04818710 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 476

Last updated 2021-03-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study was performed to compare both methods of skin incisions to determine differences in postoperative pain, hemodynamic changes, incisional time, blood loss during incision, wound healing, and wound complication.

Conditions

  • Benifits of Using Diathermy in Skin Incision

Interventions

PROCEDURE

skin incision with a scalpel

A Pfannenstiel skin incision was done through the subcutaneous tissue, rectus sheath and dissected from rectus muscle until peritoneum was visualized. group 1 (skin incision with a scalpel)

PROCEDURE

skin incision with diathermy

A Pfannenstiel skin incision was done through the subcutaneous tissue, rectus sheath and dissected from rectus muscle until peritoneum was visualized. group 2 (skin incision with diathermy)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Kasr El Aini Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • National Research Centre, Egypt

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
40 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-05-01
Primary Completion
2020-12-31
Completion
2021-01-31

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04818710 on ClinicalTrials.gov