A New Technique for Uterine Incision Closure at The Time of Cesarean Section: Does it Make a Difference
NCT04681378 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120
Last updated 2020-12-28
Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the short term operative outcomes of three different surgical techniques for uterine incision closure during cesarean section (CS).
This trial enrolled 120 patients scheduled for primary cesarean delivery. Patients were randomized into either classical double layer uterine closure, purse string double layer uterine closure (Turan), or our new approach of uterine closure (double layer step up-step down technique). For short term comparison, transvaginal ultrasonography was planned for all patients 6 weeks after surgery. Compared to group II and Group III, residual myometrial thickness was significantly thinner in group I (P\< 0.001). The number of patients with uterine niche was 10 (50% of all scar defects) in group I whereas it was 4 (20%) in group II and 6 (30%) in group III. Operative time was significantly longer in group II (P\< 0.001). This led to our conclusion that Turan technique and our new approach are associated with thicker myometrial thickness and less frequency of uterine scar defect than classical double layer uterine incision closure; however, our approach takes less operative time.
Conditions
- Cesarean Section
- Wound Dehiscence
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
double layer step up-step down technique
the incision is closed using Vicryl 1-0 stitch starting from one corner. The first layer is transversely passed through the inner myometrium-decidua line, and second layer is transversely passed through outer myometrium-visceral line continuously by alternating continuous stitches through the upper (step up) and the lower (step down) uterine flaps. The original string is returned to the starting point and tied with knot as in Turan technique. Following the double layered step up-step down closure, additional single sutures were added for hemostasis if required
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Menoufia University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2019-04-01
- Completion
- 2020-07-01
More Related Trials
-
A Novel Technique Of Uterine Cooling During Repeated Cesarean Section For Reducing Blood Loss
NCT03793153 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vertical Splitting of Muscle Layer in Lower Segment Cesarean Sections to Avoid Uterine Vessels Injury
NCT03224247 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Best Incision in Cesarean Section of Obese Women
NCT06032637 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sharp Versus Blunt Uterine Incision Expansion
NCT03377894 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Assessment of Single and Double Layer Suturation of Lower Segment Uterine Incision by USG After C/S
NCT03676907 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Two-Layered Simple Interrupted Myometrial Suturing Reduces Uterine Niche Formation After Primary Cesarean Section
NCT07229222 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sparse Uterine Closure in Cesarean Section
NCT03930134 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Isthmocele After Endometrial and Non-endometrial Suturing in Cesarean Section
NCT04198324 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cesarean Skin Incision Trial
NCT01897376 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cesarean-scar Thickness and Closure Technique
NCT02338388 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Site Infection Rates in Obese Patients After Cesarean Delivery
NCT01713751 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Wound Infection in Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery
NCT01679379 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transverse Supraumbilical Versus Pfannenstiel Incision for Cesarean Section in Morbidly Obese Women
NCT02692729 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Double-layer Versus Single-layer Uterine Closure Suture in Cesarean Section on the Development of Postoperative Uterine Scar Deficiency
NCT03039803 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Knot Burial Technique for Rectus Sheath Closure
NCT04156282 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Does Rectus Re-approximation Cause Adhesion After Cesarean Section?
NCT04483986 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cesarean 123 Trial: Randomized Trial Comparing Single, Double and Triple Layer Uterine Closures During Cesarean Delivery
NCT05750394 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Endometrial Suturing on the Risk of Uterine Scar Defect
NCT03851003 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Diathermy vs Scalpel in Abdominal Incision in Women Undergoing CS
NCT05462418 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Impact of Mechanical Methods on the Postpartum Haemorrhage Prophylaxis During Caesarean Section
NCT05948436 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Wound Infiltration for Postcesarean Analgesia
NCT02691572 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Routine Cervical Dilatation at the Non-labour Caesarean Section and Its Influence on Postoperative Pain
NCT03513237 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fascial Closure and Post-caesarean Pain
NCT04999670 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Timing of Umbilical Cord Clamping in Term Cesarean Deliveries
NCT04812223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sharp Versus Blunt Fascial Incision at Caesarean Section
NCT01297725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA