Comparative Study Between Subcutaneous Tissue Closure Versus Drain in Obese Women Undergo Elective Cesarean Section
NCT04177381 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 352
Last updated 2025-06-25
Summary
Randomised cinical trial in Kasr Alainy Hospital.352 obese women pregnant with gestational age \>38 wk ,theire age range from (25-35) years and BMI between (30 -40) undergoing elective cesarean section were randomised into 4 groups and compare the role of subcutaneous tissue closure in post cesarean section wound complications.
groups are: 4 groups each group was 86 women : A -interrupted closure of subcutaneous tissue with drain ( a closed nonvacuum drain was inserted in the tissue and exite from the skin through a separate opening and stitch to the skin) .
B-interrupted closure of subcutaneous tissue without drain. c- non closure of subcutaneous tissue with drain only. d- non closure of subcutaneous tissue without drain.
All womenu nder going CS with Pfannenstiel incision were considered to be eligible if time allowed informed consent before the surgery
Conditions
- Wound Infection
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Cesarean section
1. Abdominal Incision: Pfannenstiel incision Sharp dissection will be continued through the subcutaneous layer to the fascia. 2. The fascia will be then incised sharply at the midline 3. The transversalis fascia and pre peritoneal fat will be dissected carefully 4. The peritoneum will be then incised. 5. Low Transverse Cesarean Incision. Bladder flap creation effectively moves the bladder away from the planned hysterotomy site 6. Delivery of the Fetus and placenta. 7. Uterine Repair in two layers of continuous 0-or No.1 absorbable suture.
- PROCEDURE
-
subcutanous sutures
suture closure of subcutaneous tissue with interrupted 2-0 polyglactin 910 (Vicryl).the stitch interval is 1cm
- DEVICE
-
subcutanous drain
Inthedraingroup,aclosednonvacuum drain willbeinsertedin thetissueandexitefrom theskinthroughaseparateopeningandstitchto theskin
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
ahmed maged · professor
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 25 Years
- Max Age
- 35 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-03-04
- Primary Completion
- 2022-09-11
- Completion
- 2022-11-02
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Diathermy vs Scalpel in Abdominal Incision in Women Undergoing CS
NCT05462418 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A New Technique for Uterine Incision Closure at The Time of Cesarean Section: Does it Make a Difference
NCT04681378 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Evaluation of Cesarean Scar After Uterotomy Closure With Barbed and Conventional Sutures
NCT03182010 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
EFFECT OF SCAR RELEASE TECHNIQUES ON CHRONIC SCAR PAIN AND MOBILITY POST CESAREAN SECTION
NCT05391685 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Best Incision in Cesarean Section of Obese Women
NCT06032637 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fascial Closure and Post-caesarean Pain
NCT04999670 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cesarean Skin Incision Trial
NCT01897376 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Scalpel Versus Diathermy in Transverse Abdominal Skin Incision During Cesarean Section
NCT06352853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Skin Incisions and Wound Complication Rates for C-sections in Obese Women
NCT02685761 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Scalpel Versus Diathermy for Transverse Abdominal Incision in First Elective Caesarean Section
NCT05905861 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
External Negative Pressure Dressing System vs. Traditional Wound Dressing for Cesarean Section Incision in Obese Women.
NCT04434820 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transverse Supraumbilical Versus Pfannenstiel Incision for Cesarean Section in Morbidly Obese Women
NCT02692729 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
2D and 3D Ultrasound Assessment of Cesarean Section Scars
NCT03111706 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Removal Versus Non Removal of Ceserean Section Scar .
NCT05150678 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Uterine Closure Techniques and Cesarean Scar Defect Risk
NCT05100147 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transverse Supraumbilical Versus Pfannenstiel Incision For Cesarean Section In Morbidly Obese Women
NCT05385276 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cesarean Scar Characteristics After Scheduled and Emergency Cesarean Deliveries
NCT03609281 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Sharp Versus Blunt Uterine Incision Expansion
NCT03377894 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Efficacy of Diathermy on Healing Power of Cesarean Section Scar
NCT03988972 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Double Vers Single in Cesarean Incision
NCT05276518 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Wound Infiltration for Postcesarean Analgesia
NCT02691572 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Delayed Primary Closure of Skin in Emergency Caesarean Section
NCT04587960 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Safety and Efficacy of Surgical Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Elective Cesarean Delivery
NCT06020196 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Scalpel Versus Diathermy Skin Incision in Repeated CS
NCT04818710 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Autologous Amniotic Fluid Injection in the Healing of Cesarean Section Scar in High-Risk Population
NCT06531356 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4