Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided ESP Vs Video-assisted PVB Catheter Placement in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery
NCT04729712 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2022-05-20
Summary
Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery (MITS) is a surgical method used to perform lung surgery through small incisions between the ribs and includes both Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) and Robotic assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS). MITS can cause a significant amount of postoperative pain and if this is not adequately controlled, it can delay the patient's recovery and it may be a precipitating factor for the development of Chronic Persistent Surgical Pain (CPSP).
Regional anaesthesia is the use of nerve numbing medications known as local anaesthetics to block sensations of pain from a specific area of the body. For MITS, blocking pain arising from the chest wall/rib cage would improve the patient's recovery after the operation and overall patient satisfaction.
There have been significant advancements made in thoracic (chest wall) regional anaesthesia techniques. Ultimately, this involves injecting local anaesthetics around the nerves that supply the chest wall. A single injection of these medications will only have a maximum effect for up to 12 hours and often this is considerably less. To prolong the pain free benefit, a thin tube known as a catheter will be placed so that the local anaesthesia medication can be continuously given by a specific mechanical pump designed for this purpose. This mechanical pump will be located at the patient's bedside and can precisely deliver the medication in question at a rate between 10-15 ml/hr. This infusion of local anaesthesia medication will continue for 48 hours after the operation and will be monitored by the hospital's pain team.
The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of two techniques for thoracic regional anaesthesia after this type of surgery. Participants will be randomly assigned (like tossing a coin) to receive either an Anaesthesiologist ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP) with catheter insertion or surgeon video-assisted Paravertebral block (PVB) with catheter insertion. Both these regional anaesthesia techniques are well established in clinical practice, but there is little evidence published comparing them for this type of surgery, in terms of quality of patient's short term (1-2 days) and longer-term (3 months) recovery.
Conditions
- Regional Anesthesia Morbidity
- Pain, Postoperative
- Pain, Chronic
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Anaesthesiologist-administered ultrasound guided Erector Spinae block with catheter insertion
Erector Spinae block: A bolus of 20 ml 0.375% Levobupivacaine will be administered into the erector spinae plane prior to surgical incision. A further bolus of 10 ml 0.25% Levobupivacaine will be given at skin closure if it has been greater than 1 hour after the first bolus of local anaesthetic medication. A continuous infusion of 0.125% Levobupivacaine will be commenced via the sited nerve catheter for postoperative analgesia. This will be started at 10 ml/hr and titrated to effect to a maximum rate of 15 ml/hr.
- PROCEDURE
-
Surgeon-administered video-assisted Paravertebral block with catheter insertion
Paravertebral block: A bolus of 20 ml 0.375% Levobupivacaine will be administered into the paravertebral space after the thoracoscopic ports have been sited. A further bolus of 10 ml 0.25% Levobupivacaine will be given at skin closure if it has been greater than 1 hour after the first bolus of local anaesthetic medication. A continuous infusion of 0.125% Levobupivacaine will be commenced via the sited nerve catheter for postoperative analgesia. This will be started at 10 ml/hr and titrated to effect to a maximum rate of 15 ml/hr.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Donal Buggy, MB Bch BAO · Professor of Anaesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital,
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 85 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-05-12
- Primary Completion
- 2022-02-10
- Completion
- 2022-05-05
Countries
- Ireland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
US-Guided ESPB Versus TPVB on Acute and Chronic Pain After VATS
NCT04964401 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Pain Control in Modified Radical Mastectomy
NCT04457115 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing VATS Lobectomy
NCT03176667 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane vs. Paravertebral Nerve Block for Thoracic Surgery
NCT03758261 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block in Uniportal VATS
NCT04892901 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ultrasound-guided Multilevel Erectorspinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Prevention of Post Mastectomy Pain Syndrome for Breast Cancer Patients
NCT06884852 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Analgesia After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
NCT06836635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Bi-level ESPB Application in Patients Undergoing VATS
NCT05427955 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spine Plane Block Versus Single-injection Thoracic Paravertebral Block Via Intrathoracic Approach in Single-port Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Surgeries
NCT06160375 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block
NCT06862752 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
US-Guided SAPB Versus ESPB on Acute and Chronic Pain After VATS
NCT05160961 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block and Thoracal Paravertebral Block Following Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery
NCT03854773 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block or Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Following Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery
NCT03960736 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Continuous ESP Versus TEA After Thoracotomy
NCT05008614 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Erector Spinae Block and Combined Deep and Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block
NCT06073197 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Intercostal for VATS
NCT03902782 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block
NCT03471442 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Erector Spinae Plane Block And Retrolaminar Block In Patients Undergoing VATS.
NCT06021327 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Continuous Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Thoracic Paravertebral Block
NCT05898607 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Combined Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Thoracic Paravertebral Block
NCT05255562 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Erector Spinae Plane Block for Post-thoracotomy Pain Control
NCT04531553 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analgesic Non Inferiority of the Thoracic Bi-block in Comparison With Thoracic Epidural for VATS.
NCT04538235 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Postoperative Pain Scores and Opioid Consumption in Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery
NCT04459923 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of USG- Guided Modified Pectoral Nerve Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
NCT04886375 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Erector Spinae Block and Pecto-Intercostal Facial Block For Enhanced Recovery in Adult Cardiac Surgery
NCT05475561 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2