MedTrace Logo

Comparative Study Between Two Routes of Enteral Feeding

NCT04576234 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2020-10-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The study assess, evaluate and compare the efficacy of two methods of enteral feeding on complications and nutritional status among ICU patients.

The study had utilized two methods of enteral feeding consisted of intermittent enteral feeding by syringe pump and hospital blended enteral feeding by feeding bag and assess the patient before and after feeding for 10 days by using three tools help to monitor hemodynamic parameters, GIT system assessment and laboratory findings assessment which help to evaluate nutritional status and complications. The results showed that the complications in the intermittent enteral feeding group were lower than those in feeding bag group.

Conditions

  • Complication

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

entral feeding

Intermittent enteral feeding group recieved intermittent feeding as the feed was given over a 24 hour period with intervals of rest (e.g. three hours feeding two hours rest)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sarah Asmaa

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Amal A Mohamed · Assiut University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-09-30
Primary Completion
2020-12-01
Completion
2020-12-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04576234 on ClinicalTrials.gov