MedTrace Logo

Inverted Flap Versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Small Full Thickness Macular Holes

NCT04498624 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2020-08-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Primary outcome: difference of microperimetry retinal sensitivity after primary vitrectomy for idiopathic full thickness macular holes with inverted flap technique versus internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling technique Secondary outcomes: difference of visual change after primary vitrectomy for idiopathic full thickness macular holes with inverted flap technique versus internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling technique; difference in closure rate after primary vitrectomy for idiopathic full thickness macular holes with inverted flap technique versus internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling technique

Conditions

  • Full Thickness Macular Hole

Interventions

PROCEDURE

inverted flap

full thickness macular hole surgery

PROCEDURE

peeling internal limiting membrane (ILM)

full thickness macular hole surgery

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Turin, Italy

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-05-01
Primary Completion
2021-05-01
Completion
2021-05-01

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04498624 on ClinicalTrials.gov