Comparative Analysis of Large Macular Hole Surgeries

NCT04116892 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2020-10-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study compares the anatomical and visual outcomes in a large series of patients affected by idiopathic macular holes larger than 400 µm treated using pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling or the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique. A part of the participants will receive internal limiting membrane peeling,whil the other will receive the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique.

Conditions

  • Macular Holes

Interventions

PROCEDURE

the Cover group

The internal limiting membrane around the MH was left to cover the hole

PROCEDURE

the Fill group

The internal limiting membrane around the MH was left to fill the hole

PROCEDURE

the peeling group

the internal limiting membrane was discarded

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Tao Jiang · Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
SEQUENTIAL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-05-01
Primary Completion
2021-06-30
Completion
2021-09-30

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04116892 on ClinicalTrials.gov