Compare the Healing Process of Idiopathic Macular Hole With Different Surgical Techniques

NCT03888625 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2019-03-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare anatomic and functional results, and to evaluate postoperatively the healing process in 2 different techniques for the closure of the macular holes (MH)

Conditions

  • Macular Holes

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Conventional ILM Peeling

peeling with complete removal of the internal limiting membrane (ILM)

PROCEDURE

Inverted ILM Peeling

the inverted ILM peeling technique - the technique of Inverted flap described by Michalewska, in which the ILM is left in the edge of the macular hole and the free area is inverted over the macular hole before fluid-air exchange

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Federal University of São Paulo

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mauricio Maia, MD, PhD · Federal University of São Paulo

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-06-15
Primary Completion
2020-06-15
Completion
2020-06-30

Countries

  • Brazil

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03888625 on ClinicalTrials.gov