Comparison Between Two Types of Sedation for Elective Upper Endoscopy Procedures

NCT04410211 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2020-06-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Sedation is defined as the act of administrating a sedative drug to produce a state of calm or sleep. Sedation is commonly given to a patient in hospital settings to provide a tolerable and pleasant experience by relieving anxiety, pain and discomfort, as well as to expedite the duration of the procedure. Moderate sedation (conscious sedation) is the preferred state of sedation, whereby self-maintenance of ventilation and hemodynamic stability is achieved.

The primary objective of this study is to determine if inhalational Sevoflurane is a more superior sedative agent in terms of faster psychomotor recovery and time taken to fulfil discharge criteria when compared with intravenous Midazolam sedation.

Secondary objective is to determine if inhalational Sevoflurane sedation has better patient's and endoscopist's satisfaction when compared with intravenous Midazolam sedation.

Conditions

  • Gastro Esophageal Reflux
  • Gastric Ulcer
  • Sedation Complication

Interventions

DRUG

Sevoflurane

Incidence of side effects such as excitation, headache, apnea, airway obstructions are recorded. Patients who experiences severe excitation disinhibition as defined in the investigator's opinion as agitation. Uncontrollable patient movements that causes unsafe procedural conditions and conversion to general anaesthesia is needed Post procedural recovery scoring are taken which includes: 1. Time taken from the point that the procedure ended to the first OAAS score of 5 2. Time taken from (a) to meeting discharge eligilibility Pre and post procedure pyschometric test (delayed and immediate memory test, posting box test and Stroop test) will be done and compared by the blinded observer/investigator

DRUG

Midazolam injection

Incidence of side effects such as excitation, headache, apnea, airway obstructions are recorded. Patients who experiences severe excitation disinhibition as defined in the investigator's opinion as agitation. Uncontrollable patient movements that causes unsafe procedural conditions and conversion to general anaesthesia is needed Post procedural recovery scoring are taken which includes: 1. Time taken from the point that the procedure ended to the first OAAS score of 5 2. Time taken from (a) to meeting discharge eligilibility Pre and post procedure pyschometric test (delayed and immediate memory test, posting box test and Stroop test) will be done and compared by the blinded observer/investigator.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Malaya

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • PEK LI GAN, MBBS · University of Malaya

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-06-01
Primary Completion
2019-11-30
Completion
2019-11-30

Countries

  • Malaysia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04410211 on ClinicalTrials.gov