MedTrace Logo

Inhaled Sevofluran vs Endovenous Propofol for Colonoscopy

NCT03818048 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 32

Last updated 2019-01-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare the anesthetic efficacy of the inhalation versus intravenous technique for maintenance of sedation in patients undergoing endoscopy.

A longitudinal, randomized clinical study of 32 patients of both sexes ASA I-III, aged 18-80 years undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy, which was randomly divided into 2 groups. In both, intravenous induction with propofol (2-2.5 mg / kg) was performed, Group A remained sedated with propofol infusion (1-2 mg / kg / min); Group B by inhalation with sevoflurane at a concentration of 2 vol% through a nasal cannula with an oxygen flow.

Conditions

  • Anesthesia

Interventions

DRUG

Propofol

after inicial bolus of propofol, remained sedated with propofol infusion (1-2 mg/kg/min)

DRUG

Sevoflurane

after inicial bolus of propofol, remained sedated by inhalation with sevoflurane at a concentration of 2 vol% through a nasal cannula with an oxygen flow.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Centro Medico Docente la Trinidad

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-01-01
Primary Completion
2016-10-01
Completion
2016-12-28

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03818048 on ClinicalTrials.gov