Helmet CPAP Versus HFNC in COVID-19

NCT04395807 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 2

Last updated 2021-04-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

We aim to investigate whether the use of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure using a Helmet device (Helmet CPAP) will increase the number of days alive and free of ventilator within 28 days compared to the use of a High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) in patients admitted to Helsingborg Hospital, Sweden, suffering from COVID-19 and an acute hypoxic respiratory failure.

Conditions

  • COVID
  • Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Interventions

DEVICE

Helmet CPAP

Start-up air flow 40 L/min. Start-up PEEP 5 cmH2O. Max PEEP 20 cmH2O. Oxygen flow / FiO2% according to 92% SpO2 target. Titrations at physician's choice.

DEVICE

HFNC

Start-up air flow 30 L/min. Max air flow 60 L/min. Oxygen flow / FiO2% according to 92% SpO2 target. Titrations at physician's choice.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Region Skane

    collaborator OTHER
  • Lund University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jonas Tverring, MD · Lund University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-06-03
Primary Completion
2021-04-12
Completion
2021-04-12

Countries

  • Sweden

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04395807 on ClinicalTrials.gov