Uncemented Versus Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty for Displaced Intracapsular Hip Fractures

NCT04372966 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2020-05-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Displaced subcapital hip fractures are very common and account for almost 50% of all hip fractures. The aim of the present study is to determine whether an uncemented total hip replacement is better than conventional cemented hip replacement to treat these fractures.

Conditions

  • Hip Fractures

Interventions

DEVICE

Total hip arthroplasty

Corail Total hip arthroplasty system, Depuy. Exeter and Contemporary acetabular components, Stryker.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • NHS Lothian

    lead OTHER_GOV

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-09-24
Primary Completion
2011-12-29
Completion
2016-12-29

Countries

  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04372966 on ClinicalTrials.gov