MedTrace Logo

Multi Point Pacing vs. Conventional STUDY PROTOCOL

NCT04334018 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2020-04-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The Purpose of this study is to compare two programming modalities for CRT devices in Heart Failure patients with an indication for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Conditions

  • Compare Two Programming Modalities for CRT Devices in Heart Failure Patients With an Indication for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Interventions

DEVICE

conventional CRT

Conventional CRT or biventricular pacing "resynchronizes" left ventricular contraction by pacing the right and left ventricles (LV) simultaneously

DEVICE

MPP CRT

CRT with Multipoint pacing (MPP) where pacing can occur from more than one LV site simultaneously

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • CMC Ambroise Paré

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-03-01
Primary Completion
2023-03-01
Completion
2023-03-01

Countries

  • France
  • Monaco

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04334018 on ClinicalTrials.gov