Registry on Left Main Coronary Artery Bifurcation Percutaneous Intervention

NCT04321473 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 1500

Last updated 2020-03-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The slowly accruing evidence on the treatment of patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease drove evolution in guidelines, that currently establish equivalent safety and efficacy for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as compared to surgery, with a class of recommendation that is subjected to the extension and complexity of concomitant coronary artery disease, as assessed by the SYNTAX score.

The severity of LMCA disease, although extremely relevant due to the extent of the supplied myocardium, is often difficult to assess with traditional angiography, due to lack of appropriate angiographic views, absence of a true "reference" segment, interaction with the intubating catheter. Intravascular techniques with either imaging or functional assessment have been variously tested, although with a disturbing rate of discordant results; moreover, they are frequently underused for a number of reasons, including the additional time needed to assess both left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCx) arteries, technical challenges, costs and the small risk associated with maneuvering such devices. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured from the coronary angiogram (FFRangio) alone recently documented a high diagnostic accuracy compared with pressure-wire derived FFR.

As for the anatomical localization, the majority of LMCA lesions occur at the bifurcation, where PCI results are less favourable. The distal LMCA differs from the other bifurcations in several characteristics: a) a notable mismatch between the LMCA and the left anterior descending (LAD) artery, hampering the selection of an adequately sized stent, b) the presence of a trifurcation, with a large ramus arising from LMCA in about 10% of cases, c) the presence of left or co-dominant circulation, with the LMCA supplying all or nearly all left ventricular myocardium in about 15% of cases.

Therefore, although the European Bifurcation Club (EBC) recommends a provisional side branch approach in most cases of distal LMCA disease, the threshold for placing a second stent in the side branch may be lower in lesions located on LM bifurcation compared with non-LMCA bifurcations. As for double stenting, the evidence is controversial and a consensus is lacking. Moreover, the optimal treatment of patients with LM trifurcations is still undefined.

The aim of this study is therefore to determine the optimal strategy for the treatment of LM bifurcated lesions.

Conditions

  • Coronary Arteriosclerosis
  • Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Interventions

PROCEDURE

PCI on left main

PCI on left main coronary stenosis

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Azienda Sanitaria Locale n. 2 - Lanciano Vasto Chieti

    collaborator OTHER
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid

    collaborator OTHER
  • VZW Cardiovascular Research Center Aalst

    collaborator OTHER
  • Federico II University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

    collaborator OTHER
  • Clinica Mediterranea

    collaborator OTHER
  • Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warsaw, Poland

    collaborator OTHER
  • San Raffaele University Hospital, Italy

    collaborator OTHER
  • Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia

    collaborator OTHER
  • University Medical Centre Maribor

    collaborator OTHER
  • Clinica Di Montevergine

    collaborator OTHER
  • Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb

    collaborator OTHER
  • Clinical Centre of Serbia

    collaborator OTHER
  • Chiba University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Université Paris-Sud

    collaborator OTHER
  • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • Mount Sinai Hospital, New York

    collaborator OTHER
  • Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe

    collaborator OTHER
  • Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • University Hospital Monastir, Tunis

    collaborator OTHER
  • G. d'Annunzio University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Marco Zimarino, MD, PhD · Azienda Sanitaria Locale n. 2 - Lanciano Vasto Chieti

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-09-01
Primary Completion
2021-04-30
Completion
2021-09-30

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04321473 on ClinicalTrials.gov